FRIVOLOUS SUBJECT: There is such thing as a “citizen of the United StatesG” on this website

FALSE STATEMENT:

There is such thing as a “citizen of the United States^G” on the FTSIG website.

REBUTTAL:

United States^G can’t ALWAYS be a geography for both BOTH residents AND citizens because:

1. Nationals as Nonresident aliens:
   1.1. U.S. nationals as nonresident aliens are nonresidents EVERYWHERE under 26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1).
   1.2. There is no provision in the I.R.C. that MAKES U.S. nationals “resident” anywhere AFTER an election as a NRA⁵⁰.
2. U.S. Nationals who make the “U.S. person” election:
   2.1. “citizen” + “of the United States^GOV” in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (b) cannot mean a geography because “citizen” is nongeographical. Nongeographical words with geographical words. The same problem occurs with “trade or business within the United States^GOV” in 26 U.S.C. §864: They are both NONGEOGRAPHICAL. See:
   Establishing USPI thru laws of property
   Section 2: The ORIGIN of PUBLIC/GOVERNMENT Property: “Domestic”/”trade or business within the United States”/”personal services”, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/establishing-uspi-thru-laws-of-property/#2._The
   2.2. CItizens+D owe on worldwide income so United States^G is irrelevant. 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (b).
   2.3. The citizen+D is a resident agent, which means he’s nonresident anyway. The U.S. person office he/she/it occupies physically domiciled in the District of Columbia per 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(39) and 26 U.S.C. §7408(d) so geography of the OFFICER is irrelevant.
   2.4. 26 U.S.C. §911 is the only provision that assigns an obligation to citizens+D and its not in United States^G.
   2.5. The only reason we can see that 26 U.S.C. §2209 from the United States^G is to exclude Puerto Rican citizens* from 26 U.S.C. §911 and 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (b) for taxation abroad. So they can’t volunteer at all, even when abroad.
3. If the officer and the status have different domiciles and are treated as synonymous, then:
   3.1. Identity theft has occurred if the status is involuntary.
   3.2. Misrepresenting domicile/fraud has occurred if the status is voluntary.
4. So the only way geography would be lawful is if:
   4.1. The officer and the status have the same domicile, which is in the federal zone only in the case of nationals and the geography is limited to 4 U.S.C. §110(d) if the party is in a state. OR
   4.2. Its a tax on aliens with no constitutional rights who are nonresident.
5. Any other approach:
   5.1. Violates the separation of powers.
   5.2. Misrepresents domicile in the case of U.S. nationals.
   5.3. Constitutes identity theft in the case of aliens.
6. The only thing adding United States^G to the end of citizen* does is add to the confusion one more unnecessary layer to disguise what’s really going on. And what’s going on is nongeographical, intangible, and virtual and always associated with United States^GOV.

The only way around this dissonance that consistently works is to:

1. Claim that the phrase “of the United States” is:
   1.1. NON-GEOGRAPHICAL for U.S. nationals filing as “nonresident aliens” or “U.S. persons”. AND
   1.3. Within the United United States^GOV in the case of “U.S. persons” who are citizens*+D. The United States^GOV is intangible and nongeographical. AND
   1.3. GEOGRAPHICAL for aliens and resident aliens for the purposes of the residence test in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1).
2. Claim that the tax is on the government (domestic) property^PUB which is nongeographical and internal to the government ONLY. This includes civil statutory statuses that are legislatively created and owned by Congress as property^PUB.
3. Claim that those handling said property make a CIVIL “person” election which collectively is called “personal services” in 26 U.S.C. §864(b).
4. NEVER claim that “United States” in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (b) is geographical.

Then it always works and is consistent with the idea of “domestic“, which is always INTERNAL to the government and PUBLIC.