Summary of Different Types of American Nationals

During both administrative correspondence and litigation, it is commonplace for the government to either equivocate or compartmentalize the various types of American Nationals so that they can deceive you into not claiming a particular status. Below is a summary of the various statuses found in statutes, on government forms, and in the common law to prevent that deception:

1. TABLE

#	Status	Context	Origin	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22)	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22)(A)	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22)(B)	22 C.F.R. §51.1 “U.S.** national”?	22 C.F.R. §51.2 “U.S. National”	Common Law American National
1	“citizen* of the United States***”	All	Fourteenth Amendment	No	No	No	No	Yes	Yes
2	“U.S.** national”	Government forms	8 U.S.C. §1408 8 U.S.C. §1452	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
3	“U.S.** citizen”	Tax forms	26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a)	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	No
4	“national of the United States*”	Taxes	26 U.S.C. §873 26 C.F.R. §1.1441-1(c)(3)(i)	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
5	“American National”	Department of State	8 U.S.C. §1502	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes
6	“national”	Citizenship	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21)	No	No	No	No	Yes	Yes
7	“U.S.** national”	IRS Publications	8 U.S.C. §1408 8 U.S.C. §1452	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
8	“citizen of the United States*”	USCIS I-9 Form	Any	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	Yes
9	“noncitizen national of the United States”	USCIS I-9 Form	8 U.S.C. §1408 8 U.S.C. §1452	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
10	“U.S.** citizen”	SS-5 Form	8 U.S.C. §1401	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	No

NOTES:

1. For a description of our citizenship terminology, see:
   Website Definitions, Section 33: “Citizen” and “Citizen*+D” and “Citizenship”, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/advanced/definitions/#33._Citizen
2. For reasons and methods for government to OBFUSCATE the above, see the following article:
   PROOF OF FACTS: Why the government CAN’T AND WON’T RECOGNIZE PRIVATE OF FOREIGN and ONLY RECOGNIZES PUBLIC and DOMESTIC, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/proof-of-facts-why-the-government-cant-and-wont-recognize-private-of-foreign-and-only-recognizes-public-and-domestic/
3. There are TWO main contexts for the term “citizen”
   3.1. POLITICAL Citizen* and defined in 8 U.S.C. §1401 or the Fourteenth Amendment.
   3.2. CIVIL/DOMICILED Citizen**+D domiciled within the exclusive jurisdiction of the government you are talking to.
4. All the above confusion is a product of the desire to DECEIVE you into believing or claiming that the TWO contexts for “citizen” are either the same or can be used interchangeably.
5. The ONLY way to deal properly with EQUIVOCATORS and SOPHISTS is to define which if the two contexts that it is and which it ISN’T.
6. We therefore ALWAYS recommend a mandatory attachment when filling out any government form that asks whether you are a “citizen of the United States” or “U.S. citizen” because they never define WHICH United States they are talking about. Below is a good example:
   Affidavit of Citizenship, Domicile, and Tax Status, Form #02.001
   https://sedm.org/Forms/02-Affidavits/AffCitDomTax.pdf
7. 22 U.S.C. §212 and 22 C.F.R. §51.2 use “U.S.* national” and “national of the United States*” interchangeably.
8. 22 C.F.R. §51.2 incorporates BOTH a COMMON LAW American National and a STATUTORY “U.S.** national” mentioned in 22 C.F.R. §51.1.
9. A COMMON LAW American National is someone that a court calls an American National but doesn’t link to a specific statute in Title 8.
10. Congress CANNOT BY LEGISLATION REVISE, REPEAL, or even DEFINE terms found in the constitution from which it derives its authority. That is why Fourteenth Amendment citizens are NOT mentioned anywhere in Title 8 of the U.S. Code or even in the Internal Revenue Code. All the “citizens” in any enactment of Congress such as Title 8 are always EXTRACONSTITUTIONAL citizens in territories or possessions, meaning they are not party to or mentioned in the Constitution.
11. Common law “American Nationals” are referenced in:
    11.1 USA v. Michael Little, No. 12-cr-647(PKC)., U.S.D.C. 2017 1 (2017)
    Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=862310981064929702
    11.2. Coplin v. United States, 6 ClsCt 115 (1985);
    Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5422401643079916168&#038
    Other cite: http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/USNational-Paul H Coplin et ux Plaintiffs v The United States-6-ClsCt-115-1985-USNational.pdf
    11.3. Xerox v. United States , 14 ClsCt 455 (1986)
    Other cite: http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/USNational-Xerox Corporation Plaintiff v The United States-14-Cls-455-1986-USNational.pdf
    11.4. Readings and Bates Corporation and Subsidiaries v. United States, 40 FedCl 737 (1998)
    Other cite: http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/USNational-Reading amp Bates Corporation and Subsidiaries Plaintiff v The United States-40-FedCl-737-1998-USNational.pdf
    11.5. Korn v. Commissioner, 32 T.C.M. 1220,  524 F.2d. 888 (1975)
    Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7529641744710388861
    11.6. Korn. v C.I.R., 425 F.2d. 888 (1975)
    Google Scholar:  https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13492524255712146582
    Other cite:  http://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/USNational-Michael Korn Petitioner-Appellant v Commissioner of Internal Revenue-524-F2d-888-1975-USNational.pdf

2. FURTHER READING AND RESEARCH

1. Citizenship Status v. Tax Status, Form #10.011
   http://sedm.org/Forms/10-Emancipation/CitizenshipStatusVTaxStatus/CitizenshipVTaxStatus.htm
2. How You are Illegally Deceived or Compelled to Transition from Being a POLITICAL Citizen to a CIVIL Citizen: By Confusing the Two Contexts, Family Guardian Fellowship
   https://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/Citizenship/HowCitObfuscated.htm