IRS Forms/Pubs/Statements warning
1. Deceptive Form/Publication Tactics
There are several tactics in IRS forms and publications you should avoid being victimized by:
- They refer to EVERYONE as “taxpayers”. Thus, you are GUILTY until proven INNOCENT. See:
Your Rights as a “Nontaxpayer”, IRS Publication 1a, Form #08.008
https://sedm.org/LibertyU/NontaxpayerBOR.pdf - They equivocate FACTS with LEGAL conclusions so that your consent to a privileged status is procured unknowingly by falsely believing it is a FACT rather than an ELECTION/CONSENT. See:
Process to “Invisibly” join the Matrix: Electing a CIVIL STATUTORY STATUS, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/process-to-invisibly-join-the-matrix-electing-a-civil-statutory-status/ - They use the word “you” which doesn’t apply to EVERYONE or even to PRIVATE personsPRI, but only those who CONSENT to become “taxpayers”. This is called a “Barnum Statement”. See:
HOW TO: Recognizing deception in government forms or instructions using the “You” pronoun, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/how-to-recognizing-deception-in-government-forms-or-instructions-using-the-you-pronoun/ - They refuse to acknowledge anywhere that “effectively connecting” as a nonresident alien is entirely voluntary and consensual for most people. See:
The Truth About “Effectively Connecting”, Form #05.056
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/EffectivelyConnected.pdf - They never acknowledge the fact that there is NO liability statute for anyone other than the following in I.R.C. Subtitles A and C so that everyone else is effectively a volunteer:
5.1. Withholding agents on nonresident aliens: 26 U.S.C. §1461.
5.2. Employers: 26 U.S.C. §3403. - They refuse to define KEY words ANYWHERE in the Code, Regulations, or Publications such as “services” or “personal services”, which in fact mean serving the national government as a privileged civil person for rent to the parties you do business with. See:
6.1. Establishing USPI thru laws of property, Section 2: The ORIGIN of PUBLIC/GOVERNMENT Property: “Domestic”/”trade or business within the United States”/”personal services”
https://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/establishing-uspi-thru-laws-of-property/#2._The
6.2. Microsoft Copilot: Meaning of civil statutory “services”, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/microsoft-copilot-meaning-of-civil-statutory-services/ - They equivocate the following terms to make it look geographical, when it is CORPORATE in every place that matters:
7.1. “in the United States”.
7.2. “within the United States”
These mean LEGALLY present WITHIN the United States federal corporation as an agent or officer or representative. More on the above at:
Which “United States”?, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/united-states-how-to-discern-geographcial-from-corporate-based-on-context/ - They anonymously accuse people of being “frivolous” and illegally penalize them, but never define what they did wrong so that it can be fixed. This violates due process of law by failing to give reasonable notice of what you did wrong or even identifying your accuser so you can sue them. See:
Responding to Frivolous Penalties and Accusations, form #05.027** (Member Subscriptions)
https://sedm.org/product/meaning-of-the-word-frivolous-form-05-027/
All of the above deceptive recruitment tactics result in the following:
- Make your consent or election invisible and uninformed on your part. See:
Invisible Consent, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/invisible-consent/ - Convert YOURSELF and your PROPERTY from PRIVATE to PUBLIC.
- Remove the protections of the Bill of Rights for your absolutely owned private property under the Public Rights Doctrine and the Constitutional Avoidance Doctrine.
- Exchange PRIVATE rightsPRI for PUBLIC privilegesPUB without any real quantifiable consideration in most cases.
- Turn justice (the right to be left alone) into INJUSTICE. When legal “justice” becomes a privilege, it ALWAYS results in INJUSTICE.
What is “Justice”?, Form #05.050, Sections 6 and 7
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/WhatIsJustice.pdf - Destroy the mandatory constitutional separation between PUBLIC and PRIVATE.
Separation Between Public and Private Course, Form #12.025
https://sedm.org/LibertyU/SeparatingPublicPrivate.pdf - Creates a completely lawless, unaccountable, anarchistic government. See:
Your Irresponsible, Lawless, and Anarchist Beast Government, Form #05.054
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/YourIrresponsibleLawlessGov.pdf
For a complete catalog of IRS deception techniques, see:
- HOW TO: Catalog of Deception Techniques, Third Rail Avoidance Tactics, and Defenses, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/how-to-catalog-of-deception-techniques-third-rail-avoidance-tactics-and-defenses/ - Legal Deception, Propaganda, and Fraud, Form #05.014
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/LegalDecPropFraud.pdf
The best way to avoid all the above is the following disclaimer we put on the 1040-NR attachment:
CHOICE OF LAW AND TERMS OF COMMERCIAL USE OF IDENTIFYING INFORMATION:
I accept the benefit or privilege of no “domestic” civil statutory status or definition created or organized by any government. Exclusions claimed herein are not privileges but a statutory recognition of the exercise of private unalienable rights under rules of equity and the common law. 26 C.F.R. §1.6012-1(b)(1)(i)(c) recognizes this fact. Therefore, any administrative or legal disputes relating to this claim or submission shall be settled only under equity, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, and the common law and no civil statute. This claim would not necessary if you would penalize and prosecute third parties for falsely characterizing or stealing my private property without my consent as the the law requires. I will not tolerate efforts to convert my private property to public property without express written consent, consideration, definitions, and choice of law that only I can determine as the absolute owner of the private property documented herein. When justice becomes a civil privilege, it becomes injustice. All rights reserved. Any attempt by anyone (you or the government you work for or any third party you give my information to) to use my identity, property, or information provided for any commercial or civil enforcement purpose that benefits anyone other than me (beyond what is expressly authorized by me in this submission) is an unauthorized act of identity theft subject to penalty two times the value involuntarily extracted and doubling every year fees go unpaid. Such attempts shall constitute admissible evidence of consent to these terms pursuant to the Minimum Contacts Doctrine and to voluntarily waive official, judicial, and sovereign immunity, and pay all legal fees if recovery of said fees must be legally compelled.
[1040-NR Attachment, Form #09.077, Section 3: Form 1: SHORT CUSTOMER 1040-NR Attachment;
SOURCE: https://sedm.org/Forms/09-Procs/1040NR-Attachment.pdf]
2. IRS Warns You Can’t Trust Any of their Forms or Publications
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) starkly warns its website visitors that you CANNOT trust or rely on anything they say or publish:
Internal Revenue Manual
Section 4.10.7.2.7 (01-01-2006)
IRS Publications
- IRS Publications explain the law in plain language for taxpayers and their advisors. They typically highlight changes in the law, provide examples illustrating IRS positions, and include worksheets. Publications are nonbinding on the IRS and do not necessarily cover all positions for a given issue. While a good source of general information, publications should not be cited to sustain a position.
[Internal Revenue Manual (I.R.M.), Section 4.10.7.2.7 (01-01-2006);
SOURCE: https://www.irs.gov/irm/part4/irm_04-010-007#idm139859652464096]
3. Courts Warn You Can’t Trust IRS Publications
In addition to the above, you aren’t allowed to trust or believe ANYTHING an IRS agent says unless its under oath or penalty of perjury. This may sound hard to believe, but our corrupt federal courts refuse to hold the IRS accountable for any of the following:
- The content of their publications or even their forms. See Internal Revenue Manual (I.R.M.), Section 4.10.7.2.7.
- Following its own written procedures found in the Internal Revenue Manual (I.R.M.)
- Following the procedural regulations developed by the Secretary of the Treasury under 26 C.F.R. Part 601.
- The oral agreements or statements that its representatives make, even when their delegation order authorizes them to make such agreements. Instead, most settlements and agreements must be reduced to writing or they are unenforceable.
For this determination, we rely on the following cases, downloaded from the VersusLaw website (http://www.versuslaw.com) and posted prominently on the Family Guardian Website. Read the authorities for yourself. We have highlighted the most pertinent parts of these authorities:
Table 2: Things IRS is NOT responsible or accountable for
| Not responsible for: | Controlling Case(s): |
| Following revenue rulings, handbooks, etc. | CWT Farms Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 755 F.2d. 790 (11th Cir. 03/19/1985) |
| Following procedures in the Internal Revenue Manual (I.R.M.) | U.S. v. Will, 671 F.2d. 963 (1982) |
| Following procedural regulations found in 26 C.F.R. Part 601 | 1. Einhorn v. Dewitt, 618 F.2d. 347 (5th Cir. 06/04/1980) 2. Luhring v. Glotzbach, 304 F.2d. 560 (4th Cir. 05/28/1962) |
| Oral agreements or statements | Boulez v. C.I.R., 258 U.S.App. D.C. 90, 810 F.2d. 209 (1987) |
The most blatant and clear statement was made in the case of CWT Farms, Inc., above, which ruled:
“It is unfortunately all too common for government manuals, handbooks, and in-house publications to contain statements that were not meant or are not wholly reliable. If they go counter to governing statutes and regulations of the highest or higher dignity, e.g. regulations published in the Federal Register, they do not bind the government, and persons relying on them do so at their peril. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. United States, 589 F.2d. 1040, 1043, 218 Ct.Cl. 517 (1978) (A Handbook for Exporters, a Treasury publication). Dunphy v. United States [529 F.2d. 532, 208 Ct.Cl. 986 (1975)], supra (Navy publication entitled All Hands). In such cases it is necessary to examine any informal publication to see if it was really written to fasten legal consequences on the government. Dunphy, supra. See also Donovan v. United States, 139 U.S. App. D.C. 364, 433 F.2d. 522 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 944, 91 S.Ct. 955, 28 L.Ed. 2d 225 (1971). (Employees Performance Improvement Handbook, an FAA publication)(merely advisory and directory publications do not have mandatory consequences). Bartholomew v. United States, 740 F.2d. 526, 532 n. 3 (7th Cir. 1984)(quoting Fiorentino v. United States, 607 F.2d. 963, 968, 221 Ct.Cl. 545 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1083, 100 S.Ct. 1039, 62 L.Ed. 2d 768 (1980).
Lecroy ‘s proposition that the statements in the handbook were binding is inapposite to the accepted law among the circuits that publications are not binding.*fn15 We find that the Commissioner did not abuse his discretion in promulgating the challenged regulations. First, Farms and International did not justifiably rely on the Handbook. Taxpayers who rely on Treasury publications, which are mere guidelines, do so at their peril. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. United States, 589 F.2d. 1040, 1043, 218 Ct.Cl. 517 (1978). Further, the Treasury’s position on the sixty-day rule was made public through proposed section 1.993-2(d)(2) in 1972, before the taxable years at issue. Charbonnet v. United States, 455 F.2d. 1195, 1199-1200 (5th Cir.1972). See also Wendland v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 739 F.2d. 580, 581 (11th Cir.1984). Second, whatever harm has been suffered by Farms and International resulted from a lack of prudence. As even the Lecroy 751 F.2d. at 127. See also 79 T.C. at 1069. “
[CWT Farms Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 755 F.2d. 790 (11th Cir. 03/19/1985) ]