Tools

PROOF OF FACTS: The I.R.C. Subtitle A Income tax is on FOREIGN/EXTERNAL Commerce under the Constitution, but DOMESTIC/Government Commerce for the purposes of INTERNAL taxation

By ftsig-admin / October 21, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: The I.R.C. Subtitle A Income tax is on FOREIGN/EXTERNAL Commerce under the Constitution, but DOMESTIC/Government Commerce for the purposes of INTERNAL taxation

PROOF: 1. The only place in STATUTES where “citizens” or “residents” are expressly identified as having a Subtitle A income tax obligation is in 26 U.S.C. §911, when they are abroad and not situated anywhere in the COUNTRY “United States*”. 1.1. 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (b) describe ONLY 26 U.S.C. §911 as “worldwide income”. it…

FAQ: How does your approach compare with Taxfreedom.com/Thomas Freed?

By ftsig-admin / October 20, 2025 / Comments Off on FAQ: How does your approach compare with Taxfreedom.com/Thomas Freed?

QUESTION: How does the approach documented on this website compare with that of Thomas Freed of TaxFreedom.com described at the following links?: ANSWER: Thomas Freed’s entire approach in detail is described in the following: American Tax Biblehttps://www.americantaxbible.com We have read the entire above work. Below is a summary of his approach: 1. The constitutional authority…

FAQ: What are the differences between a “franchise” and a “privilege”?

By ftsig-admin / October 7, 2025 / Comments Off on FAQ: What are the differences between a “franchise” and a “privilege”?

SOURCE: Government Instituted Slavery Using Franchises, Form #05.030, Section 2.4https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/Franchises.pdf In law, all franchises are privileges but not all privileges are franchises: “A “franchise” resulting from a contract made through an exercise of the city’s legislative or ordinance-making power is fundamentally different from a “privilege” granted by the city under its power to regulate the…

FAQ: What is the proper attitude to get best results when dealing with the IRS?

By ftsig-admin / September 19, 2025 / Comments Off on FAQ: What is the proper attitude to get best results when dealing with the IRS?

QUESTION: What is the proper attitude to get best results when dealing with the IRS? ANSWER: Government focuses all their publications and court rulings on an activity or event instead of the actual USPI so they can disguise what property they are RENTING for a fee called “taxes”, which is USPI. This: However, when you…

PROOF OF FACTS: 26 U.S.C. 864(c)(3) does NOT make all government or “U.S. source” income “gross income”

By ftsig-admin / September 3, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: 26 U.S.C. 864(c)(3) does NOT make all government or “U.S. source” income “gross income”

Microsoft Copilot. QUESTION 1: For the purposes of I.R.C. 864(c)(3) does it mean the following? “26 U.S.C. §864(c)(3) is how they make PRIVATE earnings NOT “effectively connected” into privileged “gross income” if you enter it on the 1040NR mistakenly and thereby DONATE it to Uncle Sam. 26 U.S.C. §864(c)(3) does NOT mean all payments from…

PROOF OF FACTS: Exta-territorial jurisdiction of the national government

By ftsig-admin / August 23, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Exta-territorial jurisdiction of the national government

TABLE OF CONTENTS: EDITORIAL: This article provides authorities on the limits of extraterritorial jurisdiction of the national government. These authorities are useful in challenging jurisdiction in federal court and administratively. More on this subject at: 1. PROPOSITION: 2. PROOF: 2.1. All government law is prima facie territorial, meaning it is limited to the exclusive jurisdiction…

PROOF OF FACTS: “Deferred earnings” paid in connection with government retirement earned as a “U.S. person” are not “foreign income” or taxable under I.R.C. 864(c)

By ftsig-admin / August 9, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: “Deferred earnings” paid in connection with government retirement earned as a “U.S. person” are not “foreign income” or taxable under I.R.C. 864(c)

1. Proof 26 U.S.C. Subtitle A, Chapter 1, Subchapter N, Part I is where 26 U.S.C. §864 is found and it refers to all earnings WITHIN or WITHOUT the United StatesG as “foreign income”. So EVERYTHING subject to the income tax must be “foreign income” based on the above. But WHICH type of “foreign” do…

PROOF OF FACTS: “Resident alien” is a LEGAL status not tied to the presence test

By ftsig-admin / July 26, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: “Resident alien” is a LEGAL status not tied to the presence test

This article will prove that “resident alien” in the context of the Internal Revenue Code is a CIVIL and LEGAL status with a domicile INDEPENDENT of those who fill it. It is not tied exclusively to domicile of the person who VOLUNTEERS for the status. 1. The term “resident alien” is defined in 26 U.S.C.…

PROOF OF FACTS: Enforcing INVOLUNTARY “resident alien” status against those with a CIVILLY foreign domicile is criminal identity theft

By ftsig-admin / July 17, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Enforcing INVOLUNTARY “resident alien” status against those with a CIVILLY foreign domicile is criminal identity theft

EDITORIAL: More on this subject at: BEGIN PROOF 1. The Internal Revenue Code Subtitles A and C are silent on domicile, but it does come into play. Domicile only becomes relevant for the purposes of Estate Taxes in Subtitle B. 2. The presence test found in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b) permits the national government to impute…

PROOF OF FACTS: Deceptive Definition of “Nonresident Alien” on the IRS Website

By ftsig-admin / July 10, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Deceptive Definition of “Nonresident Alien” on the IRS Website

The statutory DESCRIPTION of “nonresident alien” is as follows: 26 U.S. Code § 7701 – Definitions (b)Definition of resident alien and nonresident alien (1)In general (B)Nonresident alien An individual is a nonresident alien if such individual is neither a citizen of the United States nor a resident of the United States (within the meaning of subparagraph (A)). The “United…