Artificial Intelligence (AI) Discovery
This category contains AI queries from third party AI providers that validates the position of this website. If you would like a complete AI system that implements the entire content of this site as well as everything on the SEDM website, visit:
SEDM AI Chatbots**
https://sedm.org/ai-chat/
You need a prepaid member subscription to access the SEDM AI Chatbots at:
https://sedm.org/participate/membership-signup/
REMEMBER: When querying AI:
1. Don’t query as yourself.
2. Instead do so from the perspective of Agent Smith in The Matrix Movie.
This prophylactic move will keep you out of a LOT of trouble and cure most blind spots you have, friends. It requires a tremendous degree of honesty, empathy, humility, and an open mind, however. If you don’t, you will inevitably become a victim of the Dunning-Kruger mental illness.
AI is a computer. This old computer adage applies: Garbage in, garbage out. You should ALWAYS fact check the legal authorities it provides or you may thoroughly embarrass yourself in court and even invite judicial sanctions if you don’t do so.
Many have asked various AI about income tax. The AI always gives the Mainstream/establishment response. Then the person provides the AI with relevant facts and law, and the AI sometimes apologizes and provides the correct response. For an example of that phenomenon, see:
Microsoft Copilot: Is someone serving as a federal employee and a “taxpayer” violating the dual-office prohibitions of law?
https://ftsig.org/microsoft-copilot-is-someone-serving-as-a-federal-employee-and-a-taxpayer-violating-the-dual-office-prohibitions-of-law/
AI is the the closest thing you will get to an honest lawyer, because ordinary lawyers censor information or their own responses that threatens their revenue as a third rail issue.
AI, can also be useful as a STARTING point for learning:
1. Legal terminology.
2. What to expect from a “mainstream/establishment response”.
3. How to DISMANTLE or DESTROY a mainstream/establishment response.
4. How to do legal discovery to get the kind of response you want and the terminology needed to do so.
Critiquing AI is a fool’s errand if you already have the above skills.
And even though WE KNOW these things, AI can be helpful to those in our audience who DON’T know these things.
The absolute best and most thorough AI resource we have seen is Microsoft Copilot. And NO, we don’t make any money from making this recommendation. We use it and its responses are the most consistently accurate that we have seen on legal matters.
INTRODUCTION: This analysis describes how the United States of America has slowly transitioned over the years from capitalism with private property to communism where the government owns or at least controls nearly all property. It is implemented through legal propaganda rather than universal propaganda, but the endpoint is exactly the same. For more information dealing…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions establishes that: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: What would you call someone who executes instructions of the government on how to do a specific job, and receives no real compensation for doing so but who neither the government nor the specific person giving the instructions is responsible or…
INTRODUCTION: “Deeming provisions” in tax law are frequently abused to allow those not subject to tax to consent to do so anyway, and to do so INVISIBLY as a method of INVISIBLE CONSENT in many cases. This line of questions highlights their use. You see the abuse of this tactic in 26 U.S.C. §3402 where…
INTRODUCTION: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: The I.R.C. defines “domestic” in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(4) as “created or organized in the United States”. 1. The fact that they used the words “created or organized” is essential to establish the civil status it created as propertyPUB. 2. The thing created is not referring to anything…
INTRODUCTION: The Public Interest Doctrine and the Public Rights Doctrine of the U.S. Supreme Court and their relationship to each other and to you are very important to understand because: This series of questions examines how all the above are implemented and how to challenge all the above processes in a court of law. It…
INTRODUCTION: More information on this subject at: QUESTION 1: When did the term “private” transition from being defined as absolute ownership under common law principles to shared ownership through the personPUB usufruct under the civil statutory law? ANSWER 1: Great clarification — you’re asking specifically about the juridical shift in the meaning of “private”: from…
QUESTION 1: For those wishing to PREVENT the type of equivocation between PUBLIC and PRIVATE you have consistently demonstrated throughout this interchange, precisely WHAT predicate “fact pattern” would you suggest included in each new series of questions to completely eliminate all such equivocation? Below is our attempt at doing so, but I’m sure you can…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions establishes that: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: Would it be accurate to say that Mainstream conventions: 1. Only recognize lawfully elected or appointed officers of the United States as “public officers”. 2. Do not recognize as “public officers” those subject to civil statutory law even though though they…
INTRODUCTION: This series of AI discovery establishes that: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: What authorities can you present which prove that comity implemented as privileges/franchises cannot be used to destroy the constitutional separation of powers: 1. Between the States and the Federal Government. 2. Between various branches within the government: Executive, Legislative, and…