Artificial Intelligence (AI) Discovery

This category contains AI queries from third party AI providers that validates the position of this website. If you would like a complete AI system that implements the entire content of this site as well as everything on the SEDM website, visit:

SEDM AI Chatbots**
https://sedm.org/ai-chat/

You need a prepaid member subscription to access the SEDM AI Chatbots at:
https://sedm.org/participate/membership-signup/

REMEMBER: When querying AI:

1. Don’t query as yourself.
2. Instead do so from the perspective of Agent Smith in The Matrix Movie.

This prophylactic move will keep you out of a LOT of trouble and cure most blind spots you have, friends. It requires a tremendous degree of honesty, empathy, humility, and an open mind, however. If you don’t, you will inevitably become a victim of the Dunning-Kruger mental illness.

AI is a computer. This old computer adage applies: Garbage in, garbage out. You should ALWAYS fact check the legal authorities it provides or you may thoroughly embarrass yourself in court and even invite judicial sanctions if you don’t do so.

Many have asked various AI about income tax. The AI always gives the Mainstream/establishment response. Then the person provides the AI with relevant facts and law, and the AI sometimes apologizes and provides the correct response. For an example of that phenomenon, see:

Microsoft Copilot: Is someone serving as a federal employee and a “taxpayer” violating the dual-office prohibitions of law?
https://ftsig.org/microsoft-copilot-is-someone-serving-as-a-federal-employee-and-a-taxpayer-violating-the-dual-office-prohibitions-of-law/

AI is the the closest thing you will get to an honest lawyer, because ordinary lawyers censor information or their own responses that threatens their revenue as a third rail issue.

AI, can also be useful as a STARTING point for learning:

1. Legal terminology.
2. What to expect from a “mainstream/establishment response”.
3. How to DISMANTLE or DESTROY a mainstream/establishment response.
4. How to do legal discovery to get the kind of response you want and the terminology needed to do so.

Critiquing AI is a fool’s errand if you already have the above skills.

And even though WE KNOW these things, AI can be helpful to those in our audience who DON’T know these things.

The absolute best and most thorough AI resource we have seen is Microsoft Copilot. And NO, we don’t make any money from making this recommendation. We use it and its responses are the most consistently accurate that we have seen on legal matters.

Copilot: Types of Preemption and application to various presence types

By ftsig-admin / April 6, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Types of Preemption and application to various presence types

QUESTION 1: 1. List type types of federal preemption. 2. Add those types to each type of presence in the following: Website Writing Conventions, Section 10: Types of Civil Legal Presencehttps://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#10._Types ANSWER 1: Thanks for sharing the table — it’s clear you’re working with a conceptual framework that categorizes different types of legal presence and…

Copilot: Whether Retirement benefits of those not consenting to ECI are involuntarily ECI

By ftsig-admin / April 5, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Whether Retirement benefits of those not consenting to ECI are involuntarily ECI

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions deals with the following scenario: Based on this analysis: More on this subject at: Retirement and Pensions, Form #08.028https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/RetirementAndPensions.pdf QUESTION 1: Are 401k accounts “effectively connected” for those filing as a nonresident alien? ANSWER 1: Here’s the direct, authoritative, tax‑law‑grounded answer based on the IRS sources we just pulled: ⭐…

Copilot: What is a “gypsy” for the purposes of citizenship?

By ftsig-admin / April 1, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: What is a “gypsy” for the purposes of citizenship?

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions seeks a definition of the term “gypsy” used by Justice Barrett and raised during oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court held on 4/1/26. Context of these questions is provided below: We think something more sinister at the state level is happening. We think they have piggy-backed onto the federal…

Why Artificial Intelligence is of ZERO value in telling the truth about CORRUPT judicial doctrine

By ftsig-admin / March 29, 2026 / Comments Off on Why Artificial Intelligence is of ZERO value in telling the truth about CORRUPT judicial doctrine

INTRODUCTION: Microsoft Copilot, Chatgpt 5.4, 3/29/26 The Bill of Rights IS the national common law: “It would be a very curious and unsatisfactory result, if, in construing a provision of constitutional law, always understood to have been adopted for protection and security to the rights of the individual as against the government, and which has…

“CIVIL Statutory Capacity” v. Classical “public officer”

By ftsig-admin / March 27, 2026 / Comments Off on “CIVIL Statutory Capacity” v. Classical “public officer”

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions posed to Microsoft Copilot, Chatgpt 5.4 establishes the following facts: QUESTION 1: What is the BEST doctrinally consistent label for “civil statutory persons” that does not confuse or equivocate them with classical “public officers” under Title 5 of the U.S. code? ANSWER 1: Here’s the cleanest, most doctrinally accurate answer…

Copilot: All Civil Statutory law is a Case of Identity Theft

By ftsig-admin / March 26, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: All Civil Statutory law is a Case of Identity Theft

INTRODUCTION: This whole thing is such a shit show! Chat GPT 5.2 is adamant that it’s all Personal Jurisidiction. You literally cannot get anyone to agree on any aspect of this thing! That’s how you know it’s deceptive. More at: QUESTION 1: Does In personam jurisdiction apply to OFFICES/statuses, or only to the HUMANS occupying…

Copilot: Defeating the Administrative State

By ftsig-admin / February 23, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Defeating the Administrative State

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions analyzes where the authority to impose INVOLUNTARY statuses or obligations comes from in the case of American nationals standing on land protected by the constitution who make no elections, consent to nothing, and insist on retaining all their private, unalienable rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. More on this…

Copilot: Catalog of statuses on FTSIG

By ftsig-admin / February 7, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Catalog of statuses on FTSIG

INTRODUCTION: The Code and the courts are influenced by the Nephilim beings documented in the Bible! Wikipedia: Nephalimhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nephilim There is a fascinating, underlying and consistent theme and tone of calm, cool deception. It rings the same from 1862 as it does today. Like the same Nephilim are overseeing its deployment. But like the Matrix, they…

Copilot: Does the Fifth Amendment still protect people not voluntarily engaged in excise taxable activities and who make no elections?

By ftsig-admin / February 1, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Does the Fifth Amendment still protect people not voluntarily engaged in excise taxable activities and who make no elections?

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions probes whether Brushaber or any other federal case waives the protections of the Fifth Amendment because of the Sixteenth Amendment or Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1. The conclusion is NO. This subject is important, because income taxation geographically internal to the Constitutional “United States” is a proprietary power rather…

Copilot: Court Doctrines dealing with Proprietary Power

By ftsig-admin / January 21, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Court Doctrines dealing with Proprietary Power

INTRODUCTION: Taxation of U.S. nationals INTERNAL to the Geographical United States of America is a PROPRIETARY power implemented by renting out government civil statutory identities. This series of questions is designed to deduce whether this method of INTERNAL taxation has a common law or constitutional attack surface, or whether the only remedy is purely statutory.…