Artificial Intelligence (AI) Discovery
This category contains AI queries from third party AI providers that validates the position of this website. If you would like a complete AI system that implements the entire content of this site as well as everything on the SEDM website, visit:
SEDM AI Chatbots**
https://sedm.org/ai-chat/
You need a prepaid member subscription to access the SEDM AI Chatbots at:
https://sedm.org/participate/membership-signup/
REMEMBER: When querying AI:
1. Don’t query as yourself.
2. Instead do so from the perspective of Agent Smith in The Matrix Movie.
This prophylactic move will keep you out of a LOT of trouble and cure most blind spots you have, friends. It requires a tremendous degree of honesty, empathy, humility, and an open mind, however. If you don’t, you will inevitably become a victim of the Dunning-Kruger mental illness.
AI is a computer. This old computer adage applies: Garbage in, garbage out. You should ALWAYS fact check the legal authorities it provides or you may thoroughly embarrass yourself in court and even invite judicial sanctions if you don’t do so.
Many have asked various AI about income tax. The AI always gives the Mainstream/establishment response. Then the person provides the AI with relevant facts and law, and the AI sometimes apologizes and provides the correct response. For an example of that phenomenon, see:
Microsoft Copilot: Is someone serving as a federal employee and a “taxpayer” violating the dual-office prohibitions of law?
https://ftsig.org/microsoft-copilot-is-someone-serving-as-a-federal-employee-and-a-taxpayer-violating-the-dual-office-prohibitions-of-law/
AI is the the closest thing you will get to an honest lawyer, because ordinary lawyers censor information or their own responses that threatens their revenue as a third rail issue.
AI, can also be useful as a STARTING point for learning:
1. Legal terminology.
2. What to expect from a “mainstream/establishment response”.
3. How to DISMANTLE or DESTROY a mainstream/establishment response.
4. How to do legal discovery to get the kind of response you want and the terminology needed to do so.
Critiquing AI is a fool’s errand if you already have the above skills.
And even though WE KNOW these things, AI can be helpful to those in our audience who DON’T know these things.
The absolute best and most thorough AI resource we have seen is Microsoft Copilot. And NO, we don’t make any money from making this recommendation. We use it and its responses are the most consistently accurate that we have seen on legal matters.
INTRODUCTION: More information on this subject at: QUESTION 1: When did the term “private” transition from being defined as absolute ownership under common law principles to shared ownership through the personPUB usufruct under the civil statutory law? ANSWER 1: Great clarification — you’re asking specifically about the juridical shift in the meaning of “private”: from…
QUESTION 1: For those wishing to PREVENT the type of equivocation between PUBLIC and PRIVATE you have consistently demonstrated throughout this interchange, precisely WHAT predicate “fact pattern” would you suggest included in each new series of questions to completely eliminate all such equivocation? Below is our attempt at doing so, but I’m sure you can…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions establishes that: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: Would it be accurate to say that Mainstream conventions: 1. Only recognize lawfully elected or appointed officers of the United States as “public officers”. 2. Do not recognize as “public officers” those subject to civil statutory law even though though they…
INTRODUCTION: This series of AI discovery establishes that: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: What authorities can you present which prove that comity implemented as privileges/franchises cannot be used to destroy the constitutional separation of powers: 1. Between the States and the Federal Government. 2. Between various branches within the government: Executive, Legislative, and…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions demonstrates the symbology for representing Presence as explained below and consistently used throughout this website: Writing Conventions on This Website, FTSIGSection 9: Types of CIVIL Legal Presence https://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#9._Types You can see that the symbology is CORRECTLY and PERFECTLY applied, explained, and understood as applied to the three most famous tax…
INTRODUCTION: This interchange defines where IRS sits as far as PUBLIC or PRIVATE. The VP/IP symbology referred to here is: Writing Conventions on This Website, FTSIGSection 2: Two Contexts for Legal Informationhttps://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#2._Two VP means VOLUNTARY Protection and includes civil statutes and franchises. IP means INVOLUNTARY Protection and includes only the common law, the constitution, and…
QUESTION 1: Is the process documented below accurate?: Catalog of Elections and Entity Types in the Internal Revenue CodeSection 3: Consequences/Effects of Electionshttps://ftsig.org/catalog-of-elections-in-the-internal-revenue-code/#3._Consequences ANSWER 2: Short answer: The process described in the FTSIG document is accurate to its own framework — it explains elections in the Internal Revenue Code as voluntary acts that convert private…
QUESTION 1: Can someone have a domicile under the common law but not the civil law? ANSWER 1: Excellent question — and it goes right to the heart of the distinction between civil status and common law status. Domicile Under Common Law Domicile Under Civil Law Can They Diverge? Yes — someone can have a…
Microsoft Copilot: Judicial conspiracy to censor or interfere with common law/private/foreign rights
SOURCE: Microsoft Copilot: Judicial conspiracy to censor or interfere with common law/private/foreign rights, SEDM; https://sedm.org/microsoft-copilot-judicial-conspiracy-to-censor-or-interfere-with-common-law-private-foreign-rights/ INTRODUCTION: This series of AI questions proves that: The above realities are now reflected on the following page of this site accessible from the Civil/Political Jurisdiction->Acquiring a “Civil Status” Menu item as follows: Acquiring a “Civil Status”, Section 4: The…