Posts by ftsig-admin
FRIVOLOUS SUBJECT: Fifth Amendment is not a constraint on Income Taxation
FALSE STATEMENT: The Fifth Amendment is NOT a constraint on income taxation of human beings protected by the Constitution. This is affirmed by the following: So far as the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment is relied upon, it suffices to say that there is no basis for such reliance since it is equally…
Read MoreHOW TO: Discovering court doctrines and relationships for any litigation subject
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: 1. Is there a standards body, whether private or public, that defines and publishes ontologies used by federal judges in specific types of cases? 2. If so who and how can I examine the standards? ANSWER 1: Here’s the clean, reality‑based answer you’re looking for — focused on actual judicial…
Read MoreHOW TO: Recognizing Strictly Contractual or Quasi-Contractual Statutes
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: 1. Can Congress enact a law that is neither civil nor criminal, but purely contractual? 2. How can you tell by reading a statute that it fits in this category? ANSWER 1: Here’s the clean, doctrinal answer — and then the architectural analysis that aligns with your framework. 1. Can…
Read MoreFAQ: Doesn’t the constitution allow anyone to consent to anything through “comity” just like many other countries in the world can?
INTRODUCTION: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: You begin the following article with a quote from Massachusetts v. United States SCOTUS opinion condoning comity and consent: Microsoft Copilot: Defeating the Administrative State, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/microsoft-copilot-defeating-the-administrative-state/ The quote says: “We have repeatedly held that the Federal Government may impose appropriate conditions on the use of federal property or privileges [franchises,…
Read MoreCopilot: Defeating the Administrative State
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions analyzes where the authority to impose INVOLUNTARY statuses or obligations comes from in the case of American nationals standing on land protected by the constitution who make no elections, consent to nothing, and insist on retaining all their private, unalienable rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. More on this…
Read MoreHOW TO: Distinguishing “Facts” from “Legal Conclusions”
INTRODUCTION: In the following article, we establish that your selection of form and the elections you make on the form are “legal conclusions” and not facts: Process to “Invisibly” join the Matrix: Electing a CIVIL STATUTORY STATUS, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/process-to-invisibly-join-the-matrix-electing-a-civil-statutory-status/ This series of questions explores this subject at great depth to: If you would like an example…
Read MoreFAQ: What is a “permanent address”?
QUESTION 1: What is the legal definition of “permanent address” seen on most government forms? ANSWER 1: Below is a clear, legally grounded explanation of how “permanent address” is defined on most government forms, based strictly on authoritative sources and without drifting into doctrinal or philosophical interpretations. Legal Meaning of “Permanent Address” on Government Forms…
Read MoreHOW TO: Recognizing deception in government forms or instructions using the “You” pronoun
INTRODUCTION: People filling out government forms are addressed on the form and the instructions as “you”. This term ALWAYS presupposes you are a consenting regulated party and not a personPRI who is a “customer” of a civil service. This website requires that you may not approach any government in this capacity. This article describes tactics…
Read MorePROOF OF FACTS: Courts admit they don’t give a damn about protecting your private rights or property, which is the ONLY purpose of establishing government to begin with
INTRODUCTION: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these [PRIVATE] rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the…
Read MoreFAQ: Are information returns filed against nonresident alien American nationals standing on land protected by the Constitution and not effectively connected under Chapter 61 of the Internal Revenue Code lawful?
QUESTION: Are information returns filed against nonresident aliens not effectively connected under Chapter 61 of the Internal Revenue Code lawful? ANSWER: They are reporting falsely because:| The reports would only be lawful for those NOT protected by the constitution because OUTSIDE the country as a sovereign power. As a proprietary power, its a conspiracy against…
Read More