Process to “Invisibly” join the Matrix:  Electing a CIVIL STATUTORY STATUS

1. Introduction

A civil statutory status legislatively created and owned by Congress as public property is the mechanism to regulate your activities as a tax franchise participant.  Under legal principles, the Creator of a thing is the owner.  Examples of civil statutory statuses include:

1. “Person”
2. “Taxpayer”.
3. “citizen of the United States”.
4. “Employee”.
5. “Nonresident alien”.

We refer to the above civil statutory statuses as “positions” rather than “offices” because calling them “offices” leads to confusing them with “public offices”.  We call the person occupying the position the OCCUPANT.  There must be a DIRECT, CONSENSUAL connection between the “position” and “occupant” or else slavery and involuntary servitude in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment will be the result.  This is further explored in:

Your Exclusive Right to Declare or Establish Your Civil Status, Form #13.008 https://sedm.org/Forms/13-SelfFamilyChurchGovnce/RightToDeclStatus.pdf

Because it would be an existential threat to the revenue of the government to reveal to you that you are a volunteer, explaining the process of volunteering must be concealed mostly by judges as a Third Rail Issue.  The articles below explain what a Third Rail Issue is and HOW that concealment happens:

1. Third Rail Government Issues, Form #08.032
   https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/ThirdRailIssues.pdf
2. PROOF OF FACTS: Involuntary civil statutory obligations are a product of Judicial Corruption of Republican Principles, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/proof-of-facts-involuntary-civil-statutory-obligations-are-a-product-of-judicial-corruption-of-republican-principles/

The result of the above processes of concealment is that your consent is INVISIBLE and UNINFORMED, as explained in:

Invisible Consent, FTSIG https://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/invisible-consent/

The court rules of evidence, however, must be distorted to make this process of consent INVISIBLE and yet LEGALLY ACTIONABLE.  This is done by exploiting legal ignorance about the court rules of evidence distinguishing a FACT from a LEGAL CONCLUSION.  All government forms require a perjury statement.  A perjury statement verifies FACTS, not LEGAL CONCLUSIONS.

1. Facts
   1.1. Are independently verifiable by anyone.
   1.2. Are based on physical characteristics or behaviors that can be witnessed.
   1.3. Deal with birth names on birth certificates, dates, times, physical addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, actions, and statements on your part.
2. Legal conclusions
   2.1. Require legal expertise and competency.
   2.2. Result from the application of FACTS to a specific contract, statute, or law.
   2.3. May only be made by those who are credentialed and authorized to do so.
   2.4. Cannot be compelled.
   2.5. Violate the rules of evidence if they are compelled during legal discovery.

Ironically, if you try to demand a legal conclusion of a government lawyer in court, they will respond with:

“Objection, your honor:  Calls for a legal conclusion.”

And yet, they use it all the time against YOU to rob you blind through franchises that you don’t want to participate in.

Government franchise forms such as income tax forms are ONLY supposed to gather or document FACTS and NEVER LEGAL CONCLUSIONS from legally untrained people such as most Americans.  These forms, however, have been abused as a method of INVISIBLE RECRUITMENT into government franchises by blurring the lines between FACTS and LEGAL CONCLUSIONS.  In order to recruit you into a franchise, the government has to fool you into connecting yourself to a specific CIVIL STATUS without you knowing that is what you are doing and to do so under penalty of perjury as a LEGAL CONCLUSION rather than just a FACT.  By doing that, you become a unwitting volunteer.  Thus, the recipe is:

1. Mix FACTS and LEGAL CONCLUSIONS together on the form.
2. Never distinguish the difference.
3. Get you to make a legal conclusion AS IF it were a FACT.
4. The LEGAL CONCLUSION then becomes an INVISIBLE ELECTION of CIVIL STATUS.

The above process is described in the training course below:

Avoiding Traps in Government Forms Course, Form #12.023 https://sedm.org/LibertyU/AvoidingTrapsGovForms.pdf

Below is a video explanation of this SATANIC recruitment process direct from Satan’s mouth:

Devil’s Advocate: Lawyers. What We are Up Against (OFFSITE LINK, 190Mbytes, 12 minutes, H.264)-the legal profession has become a Satanic priesthood that runs the entire government and which eventually will enslave us all http://sedm.org/what-we-are-up-against/

The result of EVERYONE being victimized by this process is explained below:

Government Corruption, Form #11.401 https://sedm.org/home/government-corruption/

Since there are MANY types of civil statutory statuses, there are many types of ELECTIONS.  Below is a list of most such elections:

Catalog of Elections and Entity Types in the Internal Revenue Code, FTSIG https://ftsig.org/catalog-of-elections-in-the-internal-revenue-code/

2. Consent Creates the “Person” and results in a SUBCLASS Election in the case of Nonresident Aliens

The term “nonresident alien” represents a CLASS. It is described but not defined in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1)(B):

26 U.S. Code § 7701 – Definitions

(b)Definition of resident alien and nonresident alien

(1)In general

For purposes of this title (other than subtitle B)—

(A)Resident alien

An alien individual shall be treated as a resident of the United States with respect to any calendar year if (and only if) such individual meets the requirements of clause (i), (ii), or (iii):

(i)Lawfully admitted for permanent residence

Such individual is a lawful permanent resident of the United States at any time during such calendar year.

(ii)Substantial presence test

Such individual meets the substantial presence test of paragraph (3).

(iii)First year election

Such individual makes the election provided in paragraph (4).

(B)Nonresident alien

An individual is a nonresident alien if such individual is neither a citizen of the United States nor a resident of the United States (within the meaning of subparagraph (A)).

Note that the above is a DESCRIPTION but not a legal DEFINITION. It describes what a “nonresident alien” is NOT and does not list all the types of “nonresident aliens” there are. Thus, it is not a legal “definition” because it does not give the reader express “reasonable notice” of all the things that it includes. In failing to give said reasonable notice, it violates the constitutional requirement for reasonable notice and DECEIVES the reader by omitting to inform them exactly how they can remain exclusively PRIVATE as the constitution requires governments to allow you to do. See:

Requirement for Reasonable Notice, Form #05.022
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/ReasonableNotice.pdf

The above DECEPTIVE description of “nonresident alien” only lists “individuals” as a subclass but in fact, if you examine the IRS form 1040NR and all the versions of form W-8, you will see that there are lots of other subclasses such as:

1. Trusts.
2. Estates.
3. Foreign corporations.
4. Foreign governments.

In the case of the “individual” subclass, you must make an ADDITIONAL civil election to join the subclass by pursing a civil privilege of some kind such as:

1. Deductions under 26 U.S.C. §873(b)(3) and 26 U.S.C. §162.
2. Exemptions under 26 U.S.C. §874.
3. Effectively connected elections under 26 U.S.C. §864(b) and 26 U.S.C. §871(b). This results in you becoming the “person” in 26 U.S.C. §6671(b) and 26 U.S.C. §7343 by virtue of being engaged in “personal services”, which is a code word for service to the national government as its agent handling government property in a legislative foreign jurisdiction. As said agent, you then are engaged in a “trade or business within the United States^GOV” corporation. See:
   Establishing USPI thru laws of property, Section 2: The ORIGIN of PUBLIC/GOVERNMENT Property: “Domestic”/”trade or business within the United States”/”personal services”, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/establishing-uspi-thru-laws-of-property/#2._The

If you as a U.S. national never make a privileged election above that puts you in the CIVIL “individual” subclass, then you remain a civil “non-person”, foreign, private, and external to the “United States^GOV” as described in:

Non-Resident Non-Person Position, Form #05.020
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/NonresidentNonPersonPosition.pdf

Below is a summary of all the classes and subclasses that result in tacit procuration of civil privileges and government enslavement:

#	Class	Subclass	Authorities
1	U.S. national 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c)	Citizen* of the United StatesGOV	26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (b)
2	Alien	Resident of the Citizen* of the United StatesGOV	26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (b)
3	Nonresident alien	Individual	26 U.S.C. §873(b)(3), 26 U.S.C. §874, 26 U.S.C. §864(b)

NOTES:

1. No civil obligations attach DIRECTLY to the CLASS above. They only attach to the SUBCLASS.
2. All the above SUBCLASS elections convert your status from PRIVATE/FOREIGN/EXTERNAL to PUBLIC/DOMESTIC/INTERNAL.
3. There are also other elections that can ADD to the privileges to the SUBCLASSES listed above but the don’t convert your civil status from PRIVATE to PUBLIC in doing so. Those elections are listed below:
   Catalog of Elections and Entity Types in the Internal Revenue Code, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/catalog-of-elections-in-the-internal-revenue-code/

If you would like more details on how civil elections are how you volunteer into government civil legislative jurisdiction, see:

IRS Fraud and Deception About the Statutory Word “Person”, Form #08.023
Section 7: Consent to a PRIVILEGE Creates the Civil “individual” and “person”
https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/IRSPerson.pdf

3. Avoiding Civil Status Elections

Below is an example of language useful in AVOIDING these types of INVISIBLE elections on a tax return:

CHOICE OF LAW AND TERMS OF COMMERCIAL USE OF IDENTIFYING INFORMATION:

I do NOT accept the benefit or privilege of any “domestic” civil statutory status or definition created or organized by any government. Exclusions claimed herein are not privileges but a statutory recognition of the exercise of private unalienable rights under rules of equity and the common law. 26 C.F.R. §1.6012-1(b)(1)(i)(c) recognizes this fact. Therefore, any administrative or legal disputes relating to this claim or submission shall be settled ONLY under equity, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, and the common law and no civil statute. This claim would not be necessary if you would penalize and prosecute third parties for falsely characterizing or stealing my private property without my consent as the law requires. I will not tolerate efforts to convert my private property to public property without express written consent, consideration, definitions, and choice of law that only I can determine as the absolute owner of the private property documented herein. When justice becomes a civil privilege, it becomes injustice. All rights reserved. Any attempt by anyone (you or the government you work for or any third party you give my information to) to use my identity, property, or information provided for any commercial or civil enforcement purpose that benefits anyone other than me (beyond what is expressly authorized by me in this submission) is an unauthorized act of identity theft subject to penalty two times the value involuntarily extracted and doubling every year fees go unpaid. Such attempts shall constitute admissible evidence of consent to these terms pursuant to the Minimum Contacts Doctrine and to voluntarily waive official, judicial, and sovereign immunity, and pay all legal fees if recovery of said fees must be legally compelled.

[Attachment to 1040NR Return for U.S. national filing as a “Nontaxpayer” and Private Party, FTSIG;
SOURCE: https://ftsig.org/attachment-to-1040nr-return-for-us-national-filing-as-a-nontaxpayer/]

Finally, the AI discovery below deeply examines the subject of this section. It is very profound:

HOW TO: Distinguishing “Facts” from “Legal Conclusions”, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/how-to-distinguishing-facts-from-legal-conclusions/