1. RESTRICTING WEB AND AI SEARCHES TO A SPECIFIC DOMAIN

Several AI search engines and tools offer the ability to filter results to specific websites or domains:

AI-Powered Search Engines with Site Filtering:

• Perplexity AI – Allows you to search within specific domains using “site:” operators
• You.com – Offers site-specific search capabilities along with AI-generated summaries
• Bing Chat/Copilot – Can search specific sites when prompted with “site:” syntax
• SearchGPT (by OpenAI) – Has domain filtering capabilities in its search interface

Traditional Search Engines with AI Features:

• Google – Use “site:example.com your query” to limit results to specific sites, then use Bard/Gemini for AI analysis
• Bing – Similar site filtering with “site:” operator, integrated with AI chat features

Browser Extensions and Tools:

• Phind – AI search tool that can be directed to search specific domains
• Kagi – Premium search engine with AI features and advanced filtering options
• Brave Search – Has AI summarization features and supports site-specific searches

Specialized Tools:

• ChatGPT with browsing – Can be directed to search and analyze content from specific websites
• Claude (via API integrations) – Some third-party tools combine Claude with site-specific search

For your specific need to search ftsig.org, you could try using Perplexity AI with a query like “site:ftsig.org leaving the matrix” or use Google’s site operator and then analyze the results with an AI tool.

2. THE PROBLEM WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)

Like any computer program, garbage in, garbage out. AI systems are trained with data from many sources. The quality, coherency, and consistency of the training data is VERY IMPORTANT. You as the user of AI have no control over that data. Bad training data:

1. Is data that lacks coherency or consistency with either itself or with what is actually happening in the real world.
2. Produces “hallucinations”.
3. Produces inconsistent results or answers.
4. Is what people in the AI profession say produces “brain rot”.
5. Results in bad output that creates a lot of work on your part fact-checking to verify it to the point where it is useful or credible.

Poor quality training data is:

1. Emotional.
2. Incomplete.
3. Irrational or inconsistent.
4. Often derived from social media.
5. Often derived from untrustworthy government publications. See:
   IRS Pubs Warning, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/special-language/irs-pubs-warning/
6. Often originates from deceptive propaganda of politicians. (“Poli” means many. “tics” means blood sucking insects).

3. BAD LEGAL TRAINING DATA AND DOCTRINAL BIAS

In the previous section, we identified bad training data as the cause for AI inference malfunction. In the legal field in particular, we must then consider and explain WHY the training data is bad. Here are the reasons:

1. AI is trained only on what the courts SAY in their opinions, but never what they ACTUALLY did as reported by an objective third party like yourself.
2. There is a vast expanse of data about legal cases that AI is never trained on, such as:
   2.1. Discovery in the case. That’s always off the record.
   2.2. The motions and orders on the docket before the final ruling.
   2.4. The court reporter’s record of the case. Judges have been known to actually EDIT the court reporter’s transcript things that incriminate them.
   2.3. Criminal cases. These are always unpublished. Only civil cases are in the public record.
3. Even the final court orders in some cases are censored from the public record. These cases are called “unpublished cases”. There is no way to even objectively learn why the orders in a case were unpublished because they are not in the public record.
4. Common law and equity cases, although allowed by the Civil rules of the court, are often if not mostly UNPUBLISHED. Therefore AI never learns about the disposition of these cases. See:
   Copilot: Judicial conspiracy to censor or interfere with common law/private/foreign rights, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/copilot-judicial-conspiracy-to-censor-or-interfere-with-common-law-private-foreign-rights/
5. Court orders of the lowest courts are mostly unpublished and even ignored by legal professionals. Only appellate and supreme court case law is looked at usually.

The final court rulings in each case are what AI calls “doctrine”. Add to the above the following considerations about how AI processes the very limited training data about litigation:

1. AI responses can derive from one of two categories:
   1.1. What the constitution, statutes, and regulations EXPRESSLY say and authorize when viewed through the strict rules of statutory construction and interpretation.
   1.2. What DOCTRINE says about what the constitution, statutes, and regulations say and authorize.
2. Of the above two categories:
   2.1. AI always favors DOCTRINE over what the constitution, statutes, and regulations actually say and authorize. AND
   2.2. There is almost always a WIDE divergence between these two things. AND
   2.3. No one wants to talk about or explain this divergence, because the origin of it is usually either judicial corruption or corruption within administrative agencies.
3. Unless you ASK AI to respond with ALL of the following, you will never get the WHOLE or balanced story:
   3.1. What the statutes expressly say and authorize when interpreted through the strict rules of statutory construction.
   3.2. What doctrine says about what the statutes and regulations expressly authorize
   3.3. How the two things ABOVE compare and what the differences are.
4. If you hire a lawyer, he will NEVER tell you any of this. He doesn’t want to impugn either his integrity or that of the judges who he uses to pay his bills with.
5. The system is structured to lean in the government’s favor. This is because:
   5.1. Judges may be in a separate branch of government, but they still work for the same employer in cases involving a government prosecutor.
   5.2. Judge and prosecutor pay derives from the income tax and it is a crime and a conflict of interest to rule in cases where their compensation is threatened or reduced because they rule against the income tax. 18 U.S.C. §208, 28 U.S.C. §144, and 28 U.S.C. §455.
   5.3. Government criminal prosecutors almost exclusively are the ones who indict and prosecute crimes. Like any mafia, they protect their own kin above anyone else. This is in spite of the fact that government was created mainly to protect you and not the government workers.
   5.4. Attorneys you hire in cases against the government are always worried about losing their license if they piss off their government opponent. They will therefore help the government in many cases and certainly will avoid prosecuting government wrongdoing because they are worried about losing their license.
   5.5. Therefore, if the system does anything wrong, you will have to prosecute it because licensed attorneys and government prosecutors almost never do.

Bad training data causes what computer scientists call “brain rot”, as described in the following:

LLMs can Get “Brain Rot”!, Texas A&M University
https://www.arxiv.org/pdf/2510.13928
https://github.com/llm-brain-rot/llm-brain-rot

The best example of the above problems can clearly be seen in the following line of questions on this site:

HOW TO: Distinguishing How Constitutional Restrictions are Circumvented Using the Public Rights Doctrine, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/how-to-distinguishing-how-constitutional-restrictions-are-circumvented-using-the-public-rights-doctrine/

Caveat Emptor! Watch Out!

4. AI “FACT PATTERNS”

The only realistic influence you as the user of AI can have to prevent the above problems is to inject “fact patterns” into the discussion at the beginning of every chat session. The goal of a “fact pattern” is NOT to inject presumptions or bias or equivocation into the output, but to REMOVE it from ALL AI output. For an example of these tendencies, see:

Legal Deception, Propaganda, and Fraud, Form #05.014
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/LegalDecPropFraud.pdf

The following sections deal with how to do this to ensure that you get consistent, accurate, factual, and reliable answers you can actually use in litigation and administrative proceedings.

In any legal proceeding:

1. All presumptions are a violation of due process and only facts and law can be discussed. See:
   Presumption: Chief Weapon for Unlawfully Enlarging Federal Jurisdiction, Form #05.017
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/Presumption.pdf
2. All equivocation about terms produces deception and interferes with and violates the requirement for reasonable notice of what is expected. See:
   Requirement for Reasonable Notice, Form #05.022
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/ReasonableNotice.pdf

An AI “fact pattern” helps overcome both equivocation and the presumptions and biases that the administrative state and judges inject into administrative publications, case law, and statutory definitions. However, a good “fact pattern” also ADDS a system of symbology engineered to prevent judicial or administrative equivocation. The result of using a “fact pattern” thus is to:

1. Function as what we like to call a “truth serum” to force AI to give you honest, factual, unambiguous answers.
2. Maximize your chances of winning in administrative and litigation settings.
3. Save you TONS of time getting AI to the point where it is even being rational and considering ALL the facts.

The following interchange describes how to get AI to describe what “fact pattern” to precede questions with that prevents equivocation between public and private. We LOVE the suggestions it came up with.

Microsoft Copilot: What “fact pattern” do you suggest to eliminate ALL equivocation between PUBLIC and PRIVATE in a CIVIL context only?, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/microsoft-copilot-what-fact-pattern-do-you-suggest-to-eliminate-all-equivocation-between-public-and-private-in-a-civil-context-only/

For those intent on accusing us of rigging AI interactions, we emphasize that even the IRS does this in their interactions with the public. See:

Copilot: Duties and Authority of “Ministerial Officers” at the IRS and State Revenue Agencies, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/copilot-duties-and-authority-of-ministerial-officers-at-the-irs-and-state-revenue-agencies/

Those who criticize AI fact patterns and yet DON’T criticize the SAME behavior by ministerial officers in the government are therefore HYPOCRITES.

4.1 OUR SUGGESTED AI “FACT PATTERN”

You can find a sample fact pattern to use in interacting with the AI of your choice on the following page. Simply link to it at the start of every chat session:

AI Fact Pattern For Use with This Website, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/tools/ai-fact-pattern-for-use-with-this-website/

You can find the above on the following menu on our site:

Tools->AI Fact Pattern For Use with This Website

4.2. SAMPLE AI QUESTION ABOUT FTSIG

Below is a sample site specific query searching this site for how to leave The Matrix/Babylon at the following FREE link:

https://perplexity.ai

---

QUESTION:

how do i leave the matrix based on site: https://ftsig.org

Please base all your future responses in this chat session upon the following source and symbology:

AI Fact Pattern For Use with This Website, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/tools/ai-fact-pattern-for-use-with-this-website/

ANSWER:

How do i leave the matrix based on site: https://ftsig.org

Leaving “The Matrix” According to FTSIG.org

The phrase “leaving the matrix” on FTSIG.org refers to lawfully exiting the system of government privileges, franchises, and tax obligations that the site equates with a form of voluntary servitude or “public office” within the United States’ legal and corporate structure. The site frames this as reclaiming personal liberty and private property by changing your legal status from a “domestic U.S. person” (subject to federal taxation and regulation) to a “foreign non-person” or “foreign person,” thereby minimizing or eliminating federal jurisdiction over you and your property1.

---

Key Concepts from FTSIG.org

1. Understanding “The Matrix”

• The “matrix” is described as the system of government franchises and privileges (such as Social Security, income tax, and other statutory benefits) that require voluntary participation.
• Participation is said to be contractual or consensual, often through actions like filing a 1040 tax return, applying for a Social Security Number (SSN), or otherwise claiming government benefits1.

2. Domestic vs. Foreign Tax Status

• Domestic “U.S. person”: This is a status internal to the U.S. government, treated as a public office or franchise, and is subject to federal income tax and statutory obligations.
• Foreign Tax Status: Includes “nonresident aliens,” “foreign corporations,” “foreign trusts,” etc. These are considered outside the legislative jurisdiction of Congress unless they voluntarily pursue a taxable privilege or file a tax return (e.g., 1040-NR)1.

3. Consent and Voluntariness

• The site emphasizes that civil or legal status (such as “U.S. person” or “taxpayer”) is produced only by your consent, typically via filing tax returns or applying for government benefits.
• The U.S. Supreme Court is cited as affirming that citizenship and its obligations are voluntary, and you have the right to “unvolunteer”1.

---

Steps to “Leave the Matrix” According to FTSIG.org

1. Stop Volunteering for Government Franchises

• Do not file a 1040 tax return unless required by law; instead, if applicable, file a 1040-NR (Nonresident Alien) return, which signals a “foreign” tax status.
• Avoid applying for or using government-issued licenses, benefits, or privileges that require you to act as a “U.S. person” (e.g., Social Security, federal benefits)1.

2. Change Your Legal Status

• Adopt a “foreign tax status” by:
  • Declaring yourself a “nonresident alien” (if you qualify) or otherwise a “foreign non-person.”
  • Avoiding actions that create “minimum contacts” or legal connections with the federal government, such as claiming deductions reserved for “U.S. persons” or participating in federal programs1.

3. Understand the Legal Distinctions

• Recognize that your domicile (where you legally reside) and your chosen legal status determine federal jurisdiction.
• The site claims you can be an American national (born in the U.S.) and still have a foreign tax status if you do not voluntarily act as a “U.S. person”1.

4. Educate Yourself and Document Your Position

• FTSIG.org recommends studying their materials, such as:
  • Non-Resident Non-Person Position (Form #05.020)
  • Acquiring a Civil Status
  • IRS Fraud and Deception About the Statutory Word “Person”
  • Your Rights as a “Nontaxpayer”
• Prepare to defend your position with documentation and understanding of relevant statutes and court cases1.

---

Important Caveats

• The strategies described are highly controversial and not recognized by the IRS or mainstream legal authorities. Attempting to follow these steps could result in legal complications, penalties, or prosecution.
• FTSIG.org’s approach is rooted in a particular interpretation of tax law and sovereignty that is not widely accepted in U.S. courts.

---

Summary Table

Matrix Concept	FTSIG.org’s “Exit” Strategy
Filing 1040 Return	Stop filing; use 1040-NR if applicable
Claiming Benefits	Avoid government privileges and licenses
Legal Status	Declare “foreign tax status” or “non-person”
Domicile	Maintain foreign (non-federal) domicile
Documentation	Study and document your legal position

---

Conclusion

According to FTSIG.org, “leaving the matrix” involves lawfully withdrawing consent to be treated as a “U.S. person” or taxpayer by avoiding voluntary participation in government franchises and adopting a foreign tax status. This process requires careful legal understanding, documentation, and a willingness to forgo government benefits and privileges1.