The Simplest Way Out of the Matrix

By ftsig-admin | May 20, 2025

Would You Take the Red Pill?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8L9Z2vmMTQ

There are basically TWO approaches to leaving the Matrix: Escape from within or never go inside to begin with. See:

The REAL Matrix, SEDM
https://sedm.org/media/the-real-matrix/

We take the outsider approach. An outsider is called “foreign” and “private”. The simplest way out of all the above complexity is:

To claim nationality and never civil or political status on any government form.
Show them your birth certificate.
State that nothing you say can or should be interpreted based on statutory definitions of any kind, because you do not wish to legally or politically associate in an actionable manner.
Disclaim and correct anything else.
Describe yourself as a nonresident alien who does not CONSENT to any civil statutory status, such as CIVIL citizen, U.S. person, person, etc. and therefore has to be left alone as justice itself and the First Amendment both require. In other words, you aren’t EITHER a POLITICAL member or CIVIL member and don’t need to be. The only thing you have to prove is that you didn’t consent and you aren’t in the audience of aliens who are privileged WITHOUT consent by using your birth certificate.
Reject ALL privileges and demand proof you are engaged in them in such a way that you have a duty to pay.
https://ftsig.org/how-to-reject-all-privileges-in-a-tax-return-filing/

Everything in addition to the above list involves a subjective and UNNECESSARY interpretation or application of CIVIL FRANCHISES that you want to avoid. It involves pursuit of privileges, civil status, domicile, and elections, whether political or civil. Forrest Gump would respond to this needless complexity by saying “I can’t tell you anything more than the above and you aren’t allowed to conclude or presume anything more than that”. And if someone else wants to do MORE than this, its criminal identity theft.

https://sedm.org/Forms/14-PropProtection/Identity_Theft_Affidavit-f14039.pdf

That is the ONLY KISS available. Nothing else will work, because anything beyond that is CHOOSING the rabbit hole, swallowing the red pill, and wasting a lifetime learning how to escape the trap you put yourself into with your OWN words on a government form that you never should have touched or filled out to begin with because it was a trap/springe.

The above approach is EXACTLY and ONLY the SEDM approach. God even TOLD all Christians to USE the above approach. See:

How Scoundrels Corrupted Our Republican Form of Government, Family Guardian Fellowship
Sections 3 and 4
https://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Evidence/HowScCorruptOurRepubGovt.htm

How did Shadrach, Meshack and Abednego escape the matrix in the above article?

Rejected the king’s privileges.
Rejected the identity (political and civil status) offered by the king.
Rejected the king’s propaganda and mind control. Meaning study the law so you know how to avoid the privileges.
Formed their own group so they weren’t isolated.

THAT’S THE WAY OUT, ACCORDING TO GOD. You don’t believe him? Are you now going to ARGUE with GOD Himself?

Some people have said you have to “follow the rules” to leave The Matrix. That’s what Agent Smith said in the movie The Matrix. To that we say:

The only “rules” that don’t acquire the force of law from your consent are the common law, the Bill of Rights, criminal law, and equitable principles. Everything else, including all civil statutes, requires your consent and doesn’t apply once you withdraw your consent. The civil law is not “Hotel California”, where you can check in and never leave. Domicile and elections/consent can unilaterally be changed at any time and can’t be coerced.
How you got in was consent. There is no liability statute. You don’t need to follow anything other than to withdraw consent that isn’t even authorized in the first place and is a crime. The constitution DOES NOT authorize congress to make a profitable business or franchise out of alienating constitutional rights that are supposed to be inalienable according to the Declaration of Independence.
The only reason you would need PERMISSION to leave The Matrix or follow any rules to exit is because you STILL have their PUBLIC property (civil status) “in your hands”. A franchise is a “privilege IN THE HANDS of a subject”. The statutes and the statuses they create are the main property you don’t have and aren’t using. Nothing else is real consideration enforceable in a court of law.
Even inside the matrix, there is no real consideration and therefore no MUTUAL consideration that is mandatory for any enforceable contract or quasi-contract. And giving me something I don’t need and don’t want and specifically rejected is not consideration anyway.
https://ftsig.org/how-to-reject-all-privileges-in-a-tax-return-filing/
Even for the “benefits” or “privileges” you ASK for, the government can’t be held legally responsible to deliver them so why should YOU be responsible for PAYING for them? An enforceable contract or quasi-contract requires MUTUAL obligation. See:
Your Irresponsible, Lawless, Anarchist Beast Government, Form #05.054
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/YourIrresponsibleLawlessGov.pdf
If you can’t reject all privileges and pay nothing, then you don’t own yourself or your property. Someone else owns you. REAL constitutional “Ownership” of PRIVATE property implies the right to exclude any and all others from using or benefitting from your property. Avoiding all privileges and benefits and the obligations attached to them is the ONLY way you can realistically exercise that right. If you can’t do that, we don’t even NEED a bill of rights because there IS no private property. All we need is a tax return with TWO LINES:
6.1. How much did you make?:_____________
6.2. Send it all in.

The above may be why the Lord said the following:

“For thus says the Lord: “You have sold yourselves for nothing, And you shall be redeemed without money.”

[Isaiah 52:3, Bible, NKJV]

The above may also be why the U.S. Supreme Court said:

“As was said in Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co., 311 U.S. 435, 444 (1940), “[t]he simple but controlling question is whether the state has given anything for which it can ask return.”

[Colonial Pipeline Co v Traigle, 421 U.S. 100, 109 (1975);
SOURCE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16559630216409245512]