Posts Tagged ‘equivocation’
CORRUPTION: Is Capacity Inversion a Conspiracy or Simply the Inevitable Result of Structural Incentives?
INTRODUCTION: Federal civil authority today operates through a concealed but structurally predictable process known as capacity inversion or identity laundering—the administrative conversion of a private constitutional human (personPRI) into a statutory public office (personPUB) without proof of injury or voluntary consent. As the attached materials demonstrate, this system is not the product of conspiracy but…
Read MoreCORRUPTION: Methods used by the IRS in their forms and procedure to equivocate PUBLIC and PRIVATE
INTRODUCTION: This Copilot conversation applies the output of the following article to IRS administrative procedure: REFERENCE: Private -> Public Conversion Authority, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/reference-private-public-conversion-authority/ The above article concludes that IRS has not CONSTITUTIONAL authority to convert PRIVATE to PUBLIC because their approach fails constitutional due process. Thus, everything they do is mere fiction and presumption that satisfies…
Read MoreHOW TO: How to Use Copilot to ELIMINATE Equivocation and Sophistry from any Court Ruling
INTRODUCTION: This article shows how to ELIMINATE and DESTROY and EXPOSE court equivocation on ANY COURT CASE! This is probably the most useful article on our website to facilitate a clear and unequivocal understanding of any court case. For a catalog of all the various methods of legal deception, see: Sections 17.1 and 18.1 of…
Read MoreFAQ: Why does just about EVERYTHING the government does involve EQUIVOCATION?
QUESTION: Why does just about EVERYTHING the government does involve EQUIVOCATION? Just about EVERY important term they define is susceptible to equivocation. ANSWER: This is because although they are elected to protect PRIVATE property, the only thing they REALLY want to protect is themselves. Deep down, they know they are a mafia and that is…
Read MorePROOF: “IncludIBLE” or “includABLE”?
The main word used for equivocation about whether an earning is statutory “income” is the word “includible” v. “includable”. Here is the trickery involved: Legal Documents In legal documents, the use of “includable” or “includible” can have a significant impact on the interpretation of the document. For example, if a contract states that certain items…
Read More