Posts Tagged ‘corruption’
CORRUPTION: AI/Doctrinal Equivocation Always benefits the government and discriminates against the private and How to Prevent
QUESTION 1: How does the presence test in I.R.C. 7701(b) depend on Tax Home in the case of nonresident aliens? ANSWER 1: The short answer is: a nonresident alien’s tax home determines whether their days in the United States count at all toward the substantial presence test. If their tax home is outside the United…
Read MoreCORRUPTION: Treasury Expressly Excluding States of the Union from The Definition of “foreign country” is Unconstitutional and Policy Motivated
INTRODUCTION: Proof: PROOF: States of the Union are “foreign countries” and aliens with constitutional states do not satisfy the presence test in I.R.C. 7701(b), FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/proof-i-r-c-subtitles-a-and-c-does-not-deliver-any-tangible-benefit-or-private-propertypri-and-government-is-hiding-this/ QUESTION 1: By what authority does the treasury exclude states of the Union from the definition of “foreign country” but include territories and possessions in 26 CFR 301.7701(b)-2? ANSWER 1:…
Read MoreCORRUPTION: Judges or courts illegally manufacturing facts or evidence to institute capacity inversion
QUESTION 1: All court rulings are an implementation of legal conclusions against facts admitted in the case. Since legal conclusions are not evidence, is a court opinion evidence? ANSWER 1: Short answer: No — a court opinion is not evidence. It is a legal conclusion applying law to facts already admitted into the record. Evidence…
Read MoreCORRUPTION: Methods used by the IRS in their forms and procedure to equivocate PUBLIC and PRIVATE
INTRODUCTION: This Copilot conversation applies the output of the following article to IRS administrative procedure: REFERENCE: Private -> Public Conversion Authority, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/reference-private-public-conversion-authority/ The above article concludes that IRS has not CONSTITUTIONAL authority to convert PRIVATE to PUBLIC because their approach fails constitutional due process. Thus, everything they do is mere fiction and presumption that satisfies…
Read MoreCORRUPTION: Copilot BUSTED Trying to disregard and even REPEAL the Common Law!
INTRODUCTION: The subject of this conversation is the following profound and monumental article on this website: “The Matrix” In A Nutshell, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/the-matrix-in-a-nutshell/ The above article concludes that all the evils of government originate from operating in a proprietary mode disguised to LOOK like sovereign mode. If you would like tools to PROVE in court that…
Read MoreCORRUPTION: How can Private PropertyPRI Lawfully attach to a Public CapacityPUB in the Tax Code? (it Can’t)
Microsoft Copilot 5.4, 7/22/26 QUESTION 1: Is the IRS Commissioner’s office established by legislative act or by Executive FIat using an Executive order? ANSWER 1: Short answer: The Office of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue was created by Congress, not by executive fiat. This is established by the Revenue Act of 1862, which explicitly created…
Read MoreCORRUPTION: The Administrative State is a “Machine” and the Biblical Beast
“He [God]has shown you, O man, what is good; And what does the Lord require of you But to do justly, To love mercy, And to walk humbly with your God?” [Micah 6:8, Bible, NKJV] INTRODUCTION: Microsoft Copilot 5.4 In this conversation with Copilot, we expose its biases and prejudices against those pursuing a private capacityPRI, establish the Administrative state as…
Read MoreDecoding the Mechanism: How 26 U.S.C. § 6109(h) and 26 CFR § 301.6109-1 Execute the Public Office Racket
INTRODUCTION: The following point-by-point essay details exactly how 26 U.S.C. § 6109(h) and its implementing regulation, 26 CFR § 301.6109-1, operate together as a structural accounting mechanism to execute a de facto administrative racket. More on this subject at: PROOF: 26 U.S.C. 6109(h) is how “residence” of a “taxpayer” is acquired and has nothing to…
Read MoreCORRUPTION: No Constitutional Authority to convert PRIVATE to PUBLIC property or status
QUESTION 1: What specific constitutional authority expressly allows a personPRI to elect a personPUB status and thereby consent to be regulated or taxed? ANSWER 1: The concise answer is: there is no clause in the U.S. Constitution that expressly authorizes a “personPRI” to elect a “personPUB” status or to consent into federal regulatory or tax…
Read MoreCORRUPTION: Unconstitutional Origin of the Administrative State
INTRODUCTION: The Corporate Crown The King stepped out, all draped in gold,With “Sovereign Power!”—or so we’re told.He spoke of Duty, Law, and Might,And how he’s “Protector” by divine right.But look past the scepter, the robes, and the lace,And a different reflection stares back from the face. The “Crown” is a logo, the “State” is a…
Read More