DOCTRINE: Court practices for establishing or exercising agency or capacity

INTRODUCTION: The document lays out a comprehensive doctrinal framework for how courts determine agency, capacity, and whether a signer acts as a public personPUB or private personPRI when signing documents. It answers multiple questions with authorities, matrices, flowcharts, and litigation‑ready arguments. 1. Core Question The page asks what laws, rules, doctrines, maxims, and processes courts…

Read More

Copilot: Is offering a franchise or privilege extraterritorially a PRIVATE act or a PUBLIC act?

QUESTION 1: Based on this model: Capacity Based Jurisdictional Layers, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/capacity-based-jurisdictional-layers/ Is pursing a franchise status in a legislatively foreign domicile by a government a private act or a public act by that government? ANSWER 1: Below is the precise, model‑consistent answer to your question, grounded strictly in the capacity‑based jurisdictional architecture from the FTSIG…

Read More

REFERENCE: Mapping FTSIG Capacity Inversion to Mainstream Academic Terminology and Sources

QUESTION 1: What terminology is used in legal scholarship to describe what ftsig calls “capacity inversion”? ANSWER 1: Concise answer: In mainstream legal scholarship, the phenomenon that FTSIG calls capacity inversion is not labeled with that exact term, but it is recognized under several established doctrinal categories. The closest matches—conceptually and functionally—are: Each of these…

Read More