FAQ: Is there any danger in claiming “individual” status in the I.R.C.?
QUESTION:
Is there any danger in claiming “individual” status in the I.R.C.?
ANSWER:
The guys who wrote the IRC know:
- That they are nonresident alien individuals and they steer clear of any and all domestic franchises.
- That their entities are foreign, their trusts are foreign, and their estates are foreign.
- They do not need for common law.
- The “thin red line” within the IRC.
When challenged over status, they file Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1) motions to dismiss because the court CANNOT entertain political questions.
The opposition is left scratching their head, and the secret remains protected for those “in the know.”
The common law approach is valid and sound, but the corruption and conflict of interest of most judges interferes with its successful implementation and makes a win less probable than a statutory approach.
To maintain one is a CIVIL “individual.” is the only alternative. And in doing so, one must claim they are a POLITICAL “citizen” under 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c) but not a CIVIL “citizen of the United StatesG” under 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (b). Then have no fear of the code or litigation.
One must make ZERO assertions that could even remotely be associated with a frivolous position. Pose questions NOBODY will answer, which we call “Third Rail Issues”. See:
Third Rail Government Issues, Form #08.032
https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/ThirdRailIssues.pdf
Then you will know that you are in orbit over the bullseye with a sound firing solution! Probability of Kill (PK) = 1.0
You can make the opposition run by stating the obvious.
The truth will set you free. But you must claim the truth to be set free—not dance around it and say, “That ain’t me!”
We would never deny being an “individual” under 26 C.F.R. §1.1441-1(c) and maintain the “nonresident alien individual” of 26 C.F.R. §1.1441-1(c)(3)(ii) “includes” CERTAIN “citizens” of the United StatesP per 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c) among whom most Americans are one!
Those who do not make the “domestic” election as those contemplated in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(30)(A), 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(b), and 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) are safe from the opposition, even in a CIVIL context, despite the disabilities of the CIVIL law.
If you want REAL “justice”, this is the approach to take. Justice is the right to be left alone. When you take this approach the government will crap their pants, run for the hills, and scurry like cockroaches when the light comes on.
“When the people fear the government, you have tyranny. When the government fears the people, you have LIBERTY.”
[Thomas Jefferson]
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THIS SUBJECT:
- Policy Document: IRS Fraud and Deception About the Statutory Word “Person”, Form #08.023
https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/IRSPerson.pdf - DEBATE: An “individual” is just a human being or natural person in the code and not a privileged fictional entity, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/debate-an-individual-is-just-a-human-being-or-natural-person-in-the-code-and-not-a-privileged-fictional-entity/ - PROOF OF FACTS: “individual” is a public officer fiction and “U.S. source” means GOVERNMENT source, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/debate-an-individual-is-just-a-human-being-or-natural-person-in-the-code-and-not-a-privileged-fictional-entity/