Proof of Facts

PROOF OF FACTS: Why the government CAN’T AND WON’T RECOGNIZE PRIVATE OF FOREIGN and ONLY RECOGNIZES PUBLIC and DOMESTIC

By ftsig-admin / January 4, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Why the government CAN’T AND WON’T RECOGNIZE PRIVATE OF FOREIGN and ONLY RECOGNIZES PUBLIC and DOMESTIC

The purpose of establishing government, according to the Declaration of Independence, is to protect PRIVATE property. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights,…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: That my earnings from labor on a 1040-NR tax return are not taxable

By ftsig-admin / December 20, 2024 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: That my earnings from labor on a 1040-NR tax return are not taxable

SOURCE: Proof that Involuntary Income Taxes on Your Labor are Slavery, Form #05.055, Section 8.10; https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/ProofIncomeTaxLaborSlavery.pdf More at: This section provides the most succinct possible summary of reasons why earnings from your labor are not taxable that you can use on the 1040-NR Nonresident Alien tax return: 1. Human labor or services are classified under…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: Authorities on Privileges and Benefits

By ftsig-admin / December 18, 2024 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Authorities on Privileges and Benefits

TABLE OF CONTENTS: People of all races, genders, political beliefs, sexual orientations, and nearly all religions are welcome here. All are treated equally under REAL “law”. The only way to remain truly free and equal under the civil law is to avoid seeking government civil services, benefits, property, special or civil status, exemptions, privileges, or special treatment.  All such…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: The “Presence Test” excludes States of the Union in the Case of American Nationals who are “Nonresident Aliens”

By ftsig-admin / December 15, 2024 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: The “Presence Test” excludes States of the Union in the Case of American Nationals who are “Nonresident Aliens”

SOURCE: Proof that American Nationals are Nonresident Aliens, Form #09.081, Section 7.1https://sedm.org/Forms/09-Procs/ProofAnNRA.pdf. 1. PROOF: The presence test is found at 26 U.S.C. §7701(b) as follows: 26 U.S. Code § 7701 – Definitions (b) Definition of resident alien and nonresident alien (1) In general For purposes of this title (other than subtitle B)— (A) Resident alien…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: Consent circumscribes the boundary between PUBLIC and PRIVATE, and what is DOMESTIC and FOREIGN

By ftsig-admin / December 12, 2024 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Consent circumscribes the boundary between PUBLIC and PRIVATE, and what is DOMESTIC and FOREIGN

SOURCE: Requirement for Consent, Form ##05.003, Section 1.6; https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/Consent.pdf The requirement for consent circumscribes the legal boundary between PUBLIC and PRIVATE as well as DOMESTIC and FOREIGN in relation to any and every government.  The essence of what a “sovereign” is, in fact, is someone who is legislatively foreign in relation to other sovereigns under…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: “individual” is a public officer fiction and “U.S. source” means GOVERNMENT source

By ftsig-admin / November 17, 2024 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: “individual” is a public officer fiction and “U.S. source” means GOVERNMENT source

1. Admit that “property” consists of the following: ANSWER: _____Admit ____Deny 2. Admit that by the above definition, “labor” and “services” when sold in an “arm’s length” transaction are property of the laborer rendered to the recipient of the labor or service in equal exchange for consideration at the time the services were rendered. arm’s-length,…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: “State” in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(10) and “States” in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(9) do NOT include Constitutional States

By ftsig-admin / October 26, 2024 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: “State” in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(10) and “States” in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(9) do NOT include Constitutional States

1. STATEMENT OF PROOF OF FACTS 1. Taxes are “largely a political matter”. This doesn’t mean they are EXCLUSIVELY a political matter, because nonresidents are not members of the body politic. “Thus, the Court has frequently held that domicile or residence, more substantial than mere presence in transit or sojourn, is an adequate basis for…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: Compelled Domicile is Unconstitutional

By ftsig-admin / October 7, 2024 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Compelled Domicile is Unconstitutional

EDITORIAL: This case provides an example of the adverse affects of being victimized by a PRESUMPTIVE domicile which the victim did NOT want to have and how to oppose it in the supreme court of the state. The presumption in this case is STATUTORY and imposed by the Legislature, but it could just as well…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: Ambiguous tax statutes are to be construed against the government

By ftsig-admin / October 3, 2024 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Ambiguous tax statutes are to be construed against the government

The U.S. Supreme Court has long held that ambiguities in tax statutes are to be construed in favor of the party against whom the tax is laid. In Gould v. Gould, 245 U.S. 151, 153 (1917), the Court recognized that: “In the interpretation of statutes levying taxes it is the established rule not to extend…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: “IncludIBLE” or “includABLE”?

By ftsig-admin / September 10, 2024 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: “IncludIBLE” or “includABLE”?

The main word used for equivocation about whether an earning is statutory “income” is the word “includible” v. “includable”.  Here is the trickery involved: Legal Documents In legal documents, the use of “includable” or “includible” can have a significant impact on the interpretation of the document. For example, if a contract states that certain items…

Read More