Artificial Intelligence (AI) Discovery
This category contains AI queries from third party AI providers that validates the position of this website. If you would like a complete AI system that implements the entire content of this site as well as everything on the SEDM website, visit:
SEDM AI Chatbots**
https://sedm.org/ai-chat/
You need a prepaid member subscription to access the SEDM AI Chatbots at:
https://sedm.org/participate/membership-signup/
REMEMBER: When querying AI:
1. Don’t query as yourself.
2. Instead do so from the perspective of Agent Smith in The Matrix Movie.
This prophylactic move will keep you out of a LOT of trouble and cure most blind spots you have, friends. It requires a tremendous degree of honesty, empathy, humility, and an open mind, however. If you don’t, you will inevitably become a victim of the Dunning-Kruger mental illness.
AI is a computer. This old computer adage applies: Garbage in, garbage out. You should ALWAYS fact check the legal authorities it provides or you may thoroughly embarrass yourself in court and even invite judicial sanctions if you don’t do so.
Many have asked various AI about income tax. The AI always gives the Mainstream/establishment response. Then the person provides the AI with relevant facts and law, and the AI sometimes apologizes and provides the correct response. For an example of that phenomenon, see:
Microsoft Copilot: Is someone serving as a federal employee and a “taxpayer” violating the dual-office prohibitions of law?
https://ftsig.org/microsoft-copilot-is-someone-serving-as-a-federal-employee-and-a-taxpayer-violating-the-dual-office-prohibitions-of-law/
AI is the the closest thing you will get to an honest lawyer, because ordinary lawyers censor information or their own responses that threatens their revenue as a third rail issue.
AI, can also be useful as a STARTING point for learning:
1. Legal terminology.
2. What to expect from a “mainstream/establishment response”.
3. How to DISMANTLE or DESTROY a mainstream/establishment response.
4. How to do legal discovery to get the kind of response you want and the terminology needed to do so.
Critiquing AI is a fool’s errand if you already have the above skills.
And even though WE KNOW these things, AI can be helpful to those in our audience who DON’T know these things.
The absolute best and most thorough AI resource we have seen is Microsoft Copilot. And NO, we don’t make any money from making this recommendation. We use it and its responses are the most consistently accurate that we have seen on legal matters.
SOURCE: Meta AI. 2/26/25 EDITORIAL: More on the Public Rights Doctrine discussed in this interchange at: Catalog of U.S. Supreme Court Doctrines, Litigation Tool #10.020https://sedm.org/Litigation/10-PracticeGuides/SCDoctrines.pdf The de facto government described in this exchange is further characterized in: This exchange NUKES all of Washington, DC. It’s WASHING….a TON of laundered money stolen from you in the…
EDITORIAL: Microsoft Copilot, Microsoft Edge Browser, version 131. QUESTION 1: Write a legal proof proving that “nationals of the United States” are included in the “nonresident aliens” but not for withholding purposes in 26 C.F.R. 1.1441-1 because the definition of “individual” at 26 C.F.R. 1.1441-1(c)(3 ) is more restrictive. ANSWER 1: Certainly! Here’s a structured…
INTRODUCTION: Microsoft Copilot, Edge Browser version 131, 12/30/24 The following series of questions establishes that: Those with a foreign tax status such as “nonresident aliens”, even if they do DONATE their private property to a PUBLIC use by taking privileged “trade or business” (effectively connected) deductions against it are STILL not eligible for other privileges…
EDITORIAL: Meta AI, 12/25/24 For more information on this subject, see: While the Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Kentucky, 199 U.S. 194 (1905) case deals with state income tax, the principles are universal because the national income tax behaves as a state income tax for the District of Columbia as the equivalent of a “State”,…
QUESTION 1: We actually want to help and empower de jure governments that proceed only upon explicit consent to collect what they charge for their CIVIL SERVICES that you have signed up for in writing in advance of actually receiving them. There is a simple way to eliminate the need for ALL the government deception and chicanery…
INTRODUCTION: Meta AI, 12/23/2024 Additional information at: Sources of Extraterritorial Civil Jurisdiction, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/civil-political-jurisdiction/sources-of-extraterritorial-civil-jurisdiction/ QUESTION 1: What are the judicial implications of someone domiciled and present in a legislatively foreign state pursuing a privilege in a specific venue other than their own? Is it entirely a matter of judicial discretion if the foreign persons doing so…
EDITORIAL: This series of questions establishes that: For a comparison of the two above types of “nonresident aliens”, see: META AI: “Nonresident Alien” v. “non-resident alien”, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/meta-ai-nonresident-alien-v-non-resident-alien/ This subject is further discussed in: Foreign Person Reporting and Withholding Summary, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/foreign-person-reporting-and-withholding-summary/ QUESTION 1 Is a “national of the United States” included within the definition of “foreign…
EDITORIAL: The following interchange was conducted with Meta AI on 11/16/2024. This site relies exclusively on the nonresident alien position. This series of questions helps to clarify: These are HUGELY important concepts if you want to maximize your liberty, autonomy, and choice and remove all CIVIL constraints imposed by classical governments. QUESTION 1: What is…
EDITORIAL: This interchange with Meta AI happened on 10/8/24. Note that none of this interchange constitutes evidence of a reasonable belief useful in court and should not be promoted as such. It is merely what we call a “reality check” that forms a useful starting point to validate the content of this site with law…
EDITORIAL: For more information on the subject of this discovery, see: Policy Document: Retirement and Pensions, Form #08.028https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/RetirementAndPensions.pdf QUESTION 1: If military retirement is based on years of service and therefore personal labor, and if there is no profit from personal labor under 26 U.S.C. 83, then can one earn “gross income” from military retirement?…