Invisible Consent

The Declaration of Independence that started our current republic says that all just powers of government derive from our CONSENT.

“That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”
[Declaration of Independence, 1776;
SOURCE: http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/declaration.html]

Any government CIVIL STATUTORY obligation (Form #05.037) must therefore derive from our consent, and if it DOESN’T, then we are merely property, slaves, and vassals of government. See below for a legal definition of what a “slave” is:

What is a Slave?

But HOW do they procure your consent WITHOUT you even knowing it? Answering that question is the subject of this article.

Invisible consent is also called “implied consent”. Implied consent happens when you demonstrate consent through your ACTIONS rather than either by your express words or by signing a document.

“SUB SILENTIO. Under silence; without any notice being taken. Passing a thing sub silentio may be evidence of consent”
[Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition, p. 1593]

“Qui tacet consentire videtur.
He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32.”
[Bouvier’s Maxims of Law, 1856;
SOURCE:  http://famguardian.org/Publications/BouvierMaximsOfLaw/BouviersMaxims.htm]

________________________________

“Procuration.. Agency; proxy; the act of constituting another one’s attorney in fact. The act by which one person gives power to another to act in his place, as he could do himself. Action under a power of attorney or other constitution of agency. Indorsing a bill or note “by procuration” is doing it as proxy for another or by his authority. The use of the word procuration (usually, per procuratione, or abbreviated to per proc. or p. p.) on a promissory note by an agent is notice that the agent has but a limited authority to sign.

An express procuration is one made by the express consent of the parties. An implied or tacit procuration takes place when an individual sees another managing his affairs and does not interfere to prevent it. Procurations are also divided into those which contain absolute power, or a general authority, and those which give only a limited power. Also, the act or offence of procuring women for lewd purposes. See also Proctor.”
[Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, pp. 1086-1087]

A synonym for “implied consent” or “sub silentio” is “assent”:

ASSENT. Compliance: approval of something done; a declaration of willingness to do something in compliance with a request. Norton v. Davis, 83 Tex. 32, 18 S.W. 430; Appeal of Pittsburgh, 115 Pa. 4, 7 A. 778; To approve, ratify and confirm. People v. Consolidated Indemnity and Ins. Co., 233 App.Div. 74, 251 N.Y.S. 566, 569. It implies a conscious approval of facts actually known, as distinguished from mere neglect to ascertain facts. White-Wilson-Drew Co. v. Lyon Ratcliff Co., C.C.A.Ill., 268 F. 525, 526. Sometimes it is equivalent to “authorize.” Hagerla v. Mississippi River Power Co., D.C.Iowa, 202 F. 776, 783. In the sense of the law is a matter of overt acts, not of inward unanimity in motives, design or the interpretation of words. Triboro Coach Corporation v. New York State Labor Relations Board, 261 App.Div. 636, 27 N.Y.S.2d 83, 85.

“Assent” is an act of understanding, while “consent” is an act of the will or feelings. Iilundby v. Hogden. 202 Wls. 438, 232 N.W. 858, 860, 73 A.L.R. 648. It means passivity or submission which does not include consent. Perryman v. State, 63 Ga. App. 819, 12 S. E.2d 388, 390.

Express Assent

That which is openly declared.

Implied Assent

That which is presumed by law.

Mutual Assent

The meeting of the minds of both or all the parties to a contract; the fact that each agrees to all the terms and conditions, in the same sense and with the same meaning as the others. Insurance Co. v. Young, 23 Wall. 107, 23 L.Ed. 152.

[Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition, p. 149]

Assent is sometimes also called “ratification” or “election” in statutory law. When you “elect” to do something, you LITERALLY ELECT yourself into a public office in most cases and become a public servant often unconsciously. “Assent” is the reason why government employees seeking your cooperation will ask you the question:

“Do you UNDERSTAND?” [meaning STAND UNDER them in an act of religious idolatry, just like Satan asked Jesus to do on the mountain top when tempted by Satan?]

QUESTION: Why does the government use “INVISIBLE CONSENT” to get you to volunteer and NEVER inform you HOW you VOLUNTEER?

ANSWER: Because if they did, they would lose their authority to civilly govern you since most people would just say no and tell them to pack sand or make the conditions of saying yes so costly or burdensome that the government would never efficiently fleece the sheep. DUUUH!

Someone who is “civilly governed” in our law system is called a “subject”, and being a “subject” is VOLUNTARY. This is covered in:

Why Statutory Civil Law is Law for Government and Not Private Persons, Form #05.037
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/StatLawGovt.pdf

So how they procure your consent is a Third Rail Issue (Form #8.032) they simply CANNOT talk about.

Consent in some form (Form #05.003) is the only method by which legally enforceable civil statutory obligations (Form #05.037) can be lawfully acquired against you as a VOLUNTARY “subject” without the presence of an injury or constitutional tort of some kind.

1. What happens when you DON’T consent

1. What is “Justice”?, Form #05.050– in the absence of ANY and ALL CONSENT, the only lawful thing government can do is leave you CIVILLLY alone and protect your right to be left alone under the common law and civil statutory franchise “codes”.

2. Why you should NEVER consent to anything government does or even WANTS to do to you

1. The Problem in Modern Day America-why America is SCREWED UP: Stupid people consenting to things the Bible forbids. We call this “electile dysfunction”.
2. Noncompliant Movie by Krisanne Hall -Why you NEED to UNCONSENT or WITHDRAW your consent to remain free, sovereign, and to restore your EQUALITY to the government in court. If you don’t, you will be a slave and commit religious idolatry.

3. Why you have a RIGHT to NOT consent

1. Requirement for Consent, Form #05.003 -Section 1 introduces the legal requirement for consent. Section 9.4 talks about “invisible consent”.
2. Your Exclusive Right to Declare or Establish Your Civil Status, Form #13.008 -Civil statutory statuses are GOVERNMENT PROPERTY. If you choose one, you become a slave. If you don’t and they enforce one against you, they are STEALING property from you. That property are the CIVIL STATUTORY OBLIGATIONS attached to the civil status.

4. How “invisible” or “implied” consent happens

“Invisible consent” for a American national and nonresident alien is presumed when:

1. You make what the IRS calls an “election” of ANY kind on a government form. This is an act of consent and choice that LITERALLY “elects” you into a public office managing formerly private property donated to a public use to procure the “benefits” of a government franchise (Form #05.030). This is also called a “tacit procuration”. Examples:
   1.1 26 U.S.C. §6013(g): You “elect” to be treated as a resident alien when filing jointly with a STATUTORY “U.S. citizen” spouse.
   1.2 26 U.S.C. §871: You “elect” to treat foreign real property as “United States real property” under the FIRPTA Act. See Form #05.028**
   1.3. You “elect” to file the 1040 form instead of the 1040NR form. That means in effect that you volunteered to be treated as a STATUTORY “U.S. citizen” instead of a “nonresident alien” (Form #05.020). Thus, you subjected your ENTIRE earnings WORLDWIDE to income taxation instead of ONLY earnings originating from the federal government or the federal zone. See Form #08.024 and Form #08.021.
   1.4 You “elect” to treat earnings that are not from the federal zone or the federal government as being “effectively connected” to the “trade or business” franchise in order to claim deductions that you DO NOT NEED in most cases. See Form #09.074**.
   1.5 You “elect” to treat your earnings from labor as STATUTORY “wages” by filing a W-4 instead of our W-8SUB, Form #04.231. You thus make them ALL “gross income”, even though such taxes would otherwise be SLAVERY and unconstitutional per 26 U.S.C. §3402(p) and 26 C.F.R.§ 31.3402(p)-1. See Form #09.001.
2. You provide a Social Security Number(SSN) or Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN). 26 C.F.R. §301.6109-1 says that SSNs/TINs are only required for nonresident aliens when they are engaged in a “trade or business” (Form #05.001), meaning a public office in the national but not state government. By providing one when you didn’t need to, you are presumed to consent to the duties of a public office and to being regulated and taxed.
3. You associate your geographical self or your earnings with the term “United States” when located outside of the District of Columbia or a federal territory. The only other “United States” you can be talking about is the U.S. Inc. federal corporation described in 28 U.S.C. §3002(15)(A). The only thing you can be in that capacity is a public officer WITHIN the corporation. That is what “within the United States” means in that context.
4. You file any tax form as a CITIZEN or RESIDENT of any kind. Since obligations attach to the status and slavery is illegal in the case of a human being, the only thing these statuses can be are public offices within the national government created by and owned by Uncle. For proof that claiming these statuses makes you someone volunteering for a public office within the Department of Treasury that works for the Secretary of the Treasury, see:
   How American Nationals Volunteer to Pay Income Tax, Form #08.025
   https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/HowYouVolForIncomeTax.pdf
5. Information returns are filed against your earnings that connect you with a public office or “trade or business” that you didn’t rebut or correct. 26 U.S.C. §6041(a) says these reports can only be filed against earning connected with a “trade or business”, meaning a public office in the national government. For proof:
   Correcting Erroneous Information Returns, Form #04.001
   https://sedm.org/Forms/04-Tax/0-CorrErrInfoRtns/CorrErrInfoRtns.pdf
6. You claim any civil statutory status on a government form that comes with civil statutory obligations. Since slavery was outlawed everywhere by the Thirteenth Amendment, including federal territory, then you must be a volunteer. The obligations attached to the status are PROPERTY, and that property is also being STOLEN from you if you didn’t consent to donate it. See:
   6.1 Your Exclusive Right to Declare or Establish Your Civil Status, Form #13.008
   https://sedm.org/Forms/13-SelfFamilyChurchGovnce/RightToDeclStatus.pdf
   6.2 Why Statutory Civil Law is Law for Government and Not Private Persons, Form #05.037
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/StatLawGovt.pdf
   6.3 Avoiding Traps on Government Forms Course, Form #12.023
   https://sedm.org/LibertyU/AvoidingTrapsGovForms.pdf

Below are documents on this site and elsewhere describing how implied consent happens:

1. Catalog of “elections” in the Internal Revenue Code, FTSIG
2. THE Problem in Modern Day America, SEDM
3. How American Nationals VOLUNTEER to Pay Income Tax, Form #08.024-all “taxpayers” are VOLUNTEERS serving in public offices within the Department of Treasury! They work for the Secretary of the Treasury and function in effect as “registered agents” for the office of “taxpayer”, which is domiciled in the District of Columbia as required by 4 U.S.C.  §72.
4. Why Domicile and Becoming a “Taxpayer” Require Your Consent, Form #05.002 – how you consent to the civil statutory law by CHOOSING a civil domicile.
5. Government Instituted Slavery Using Franchises, Form #05.030 -franchises are loans of government property with legal strings attached. They take the form of contracts and are implemented as civil statutory codes. They are the origin of ALL the government’s authority to enact civil legislation or enforcement.
6. Why the Federal Income Tax is a Privilege Tax Upon Government Property, Form #04.404** (Member Subscriptions)-the income tax is a property rental fee for the use, enjoyment, or “benefit” of government services or property. That is why the IRS is called the “service”: you are the customer requesting a “service” that you have to pay them for.
7. Invisible Contracts-fascinating book by George Mercier
   •  ENTIRE BOOK (2.6 Mbytes, 792 pages)
   • 01-Introduction
   • 02-Third Party Interference with a Contract
   • 03-Bank Accounts
   • 04-The Story of Banking
   • 05-The Employment Contract
   • 06-Admiralty Jurisdiction
   • 07-The Citizenship Contract
   • 08-Federal Reserve Notes
   • 09-10-Insurance and Federal Licensing Programs
   • 11-State Created Juristic Benefits
   • 12-Government Enforcement of Commercial Interests
   • 13-The Residency Contract

5. How Laws, Publications, and Policies Hide Consent

1. Laws
   1.1. When the 1939 Internal Revenue Code was recodified in 1954, the definition of “gross income” now in 26 U.S.C. §61(a) was modified to remove the words “gains, profits” in front of the word “income” so that those reading the new version would falsely believe that it is a tax on “GROSS RECEIPTS” instead of only profit as required by the Sixteenth Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court in Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426 (Supreme Court 1955), Note 11 pointed out that the definition of “income” hadn’t changed and that it’s still “PROFIT” and not “GROSS RECEIPTS”. Thus, putting ALL earnings instead of only PROFIT in the income section of the 1040 or 1040NR becomes an ELECTION to convert ALL your earnings instead of only profit to a public use, a public purpose, and a public office and make it taxable.
   1.2. 26 U.S.C. §6671(b) and 26 U.S.C. §7343 say that those who are “persons” are subject to CIVIL and CRIMINAL enforcement respectively and have a duty, but never identify exactly HOW one becomes such a “person”. Domicile is the minimum requirement to do so but they don’t admit that. you are left wondering HOW you acquired the obligations attached to the status and how to avoid the status. Thus, anyone who enforces that status against you is electing you into the status of an “officer or employee of a corporation or partnership” with a domicile within the exclusive jurisdiction of congress. See:
   Policy Document: IRS Fraud and Deception with the Statutory Word “Person”, Form #08.023
   https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/IRSPerson.pdf
2. IRS Publications
   2.1. IRS Publications never admit that “income” in a constitutional sense means PROFIT, and not “GROSS RECEIPTS”. THIS IS THE MOST important oversite there is and it would make the taxable earnings of most Americans near ZERO.
   2.2. IRS Publications never actually define the purpose of “effectively connecting”. In reality, only you can “effectively connect” and doing so is an election to convert PRIVATE property to PUBLIC property.
   2.3. IRS Publications never define the purpose of “trade or business”, which is to donate your PRIVATE property to a PUBLIC use as a consequence of pursuing government/public property.
   2.4. The IRS Publications and especially Publications 54 and 519 are SILENT on the ability of American Nationals in states of the Union to file as nonresident aliens, even though it is perfectly permissible. This would allow most Americans to lawfully opt out of all government mandates, so they don’t want people knowing they have this option and thus by DEFAULT ELECT to be subject to such mandates. See:
   Proof that American Nationals are Nonresident Aliens, Form #09.081
   https://sedm.org/Forms/09-Procs/ProofAnNRA.pdf
   2.5. On the 1040 and 1040-NR tax returns, entering any amount in the Income section connects it with a “trade or business” under 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(26) by allowing you to take “trade or business” deductions against it in 26 U.S.C. §162. Thus, you are donating PRIVATE property to a PUBLIC use, public purpose, and public office. You can’t enter anything in the income section if you don’t wish to donate and point that out. The 1040-NR instructions even warn that entering amounts there constitutes an attempt to “effectively connect” your otherwise PRIVATE earnings, and therefore DONTATE them to being taxable.
3. IRS Policies
   3.1. We have seen several occasions where, those who lawfully file a tax return to get all their money back and have gone back to request a copy of all paperwork filed may be told by the IRS says it was lost. IRS doesn’t want anyone having proof of how to get all their money back that people can show others. We think IRS has the evidence but has a secret internal policy to make the return information classified or “for official use only”.
   3.2. Even though our filing procedures are perfectly lawful and constitutional, there have been occasions where the IRS has sent a letter after filing asking if the filer would rescind their filing in order to avoid the financial losses of having to pay the refund they are lawfully entitled to.
   3.3. IRS bangs the drums about how the Sixteenth Amendment authorized income tax, but ignores its most important restriction, which is that income tax is ONLY on profit, and that there is NO profit in one’s own labor. See:
   Proof that Involuntary Income Taxes on Your labor are Slavery, Form #05.055
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/ProofIncomeTaxLaborSlavery.pdf

6. Abuse of “INCLUDES” is designed to DECEIVE you into consenting to taxation you aren’t subject to

SOURCE: Legal Deception, Propaganda, and Fraud, Form #05.014, Section 16.2.1.

The constitution REQUIRES what is called “reasonable notice” of what the law requires of you. See:

Requirement for Reasonable Notice, Form #05.022
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/ReasonableNotice.pdf

Reasonable notice is satisfied when the rules of statutory construction are observed, which require that the definition of a term must EXPRESSLY include EVERYTHING that is included. Everything not EXPRESSLY included is deemed to be PURPOSEFULLY excluded:

“It is axiomatic that the statutory definition of the term excludes unstated meanings of that term.  Colautti v. Franklin, 439 U.S. 379, 392, and n. 10 (1979). Congress’ use of the term “propaganda” in this statute, as indeed in other legislation, has no pejorative connotation.{19} As judges, it is our duty to [481 U.S. 485] construe legislation as it is written, not as it might be read by a layman, or as it might be understood by someone who has not even read it.“

[Meese v. Keene, 481 U.S. 465, 484 (1987)]

“When a statute includes an explicit definition, we must follow that definition, even if it varies from that term’s ordinary meaning. Meese v. Keene, 481 U.S. 465, 484-485 (1987) (“It is axiomatic that the statutory definition of the term excludes unstated meanings of that term”); Colautti v. Franklin, 439 U.S. at 392-393, n. 10 (“As a rule, `a definition which declares what a term “means” . . . excludes any meaning that is not stated’”); Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Lenroot, 323 U.S. 490, 502 (1945); Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of N.J., 294 U.S. 87, 95-96 (1935) (Cardozo, J.); see also 2A N. Singer, Sutherland on Statutes and Statutory Construction § 47.07, p. 152, and n. 10 (5th ed. 1992) (collecting cases). That is to say, the statute, read “as a whole,” post at 998 [530 U.S. 943] (THOMAS, J., dissenting), leads the reader to a definition. That definition does not include the Attorney General’s restriction — “the child up to the head.” Its words, “substantial portion,” indicate the contrary.” 

[Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000)]

Some legislatures attempt to skirt the above rules through the abuse of the word “includes” and “including”:

Utah Code
68-3-12

(1)(f) “Include,” “includes,” or “including” means that the items listed are not an exclusive list, unless the word “only” or similar language is used to expressly indicate that the list is an exclusive list.

The definition of “individual” in the Utah code then invokes “includes”:

Utah Code
59-10-103

(k) “Individual” means a natural person and includes aliens and minors.

The burden of proof of all those who want to insist that NATIONALS born or naturalized in the COUNTRY “United States” are statutory “individuals” therefore falls upon the government to provide a statute SOMEWHERE in the Utah Tax Code ONLY that EXPRESSLY includes anyone other than minors and aliens. If they can’t, then your CONSENT in some form is required to add yourself to the definition.

HOWEVER, even with consent, a private party has no authority to legislate. Adding to a statutory definition by your consent therefore cannot expand statutory definitions, because the power to legislate is reserved EXCLUSIVELY to the LEGISLATIVE branch and CANNOT be delegated. So NOT EVEN CONSENT can add “nationals” to the definition of “individual” above. And by “consent” we mean either YOUR consent, that of the judge, or even consent of the prosecutor. The creator of our Three Branch system of government explained why this is:

“When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty; because apprehensions may arise, lest the same monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner.

Again, there is no liberty, if the judiciary power be not separated from the legislative and executive. Were it joined with the legislative, the life and liberty of the subject would be exposed to arbitrary control; for the judge would be then the legislator. Were it joined to the executive power, the judge might behave with violence and oppression [sound familiar?].

There would be an end of everything, were the same man or the same body, whether of the nobles or of the people, to exercise those three powers, that of enacting laws, that of executing the public resolutions, and of trying the causes of individuals.”

[. . .]

In what a situation must the poor subject be in those republics! The same body of magistrates are possessed, as executors of the laws, of the whole power they have given themselves in quality of legislators. They may plunder the state by their general determinations; and as they have likewise the judiciary power in their hands, every private citizen may be ruined by their particular decisions.”
[The Spirit of Laws, Charles de Montesquieu, Book XI, Section 6, 1758;
SOURCE: http://famguardian.org\Publications\SpiritOfLaws\sol_11.htm]

The Legislature can only make CIVIL rules for MEMBERS working for the government, whether in public offices or as CIVIL STATUTORY “citizens” and “residents”. Domicile or seeking public office are the methods of joining. Those who have not joined are nonresidents and “transient foreigners”. as we prove in:

1. Why Statutory Civil Law is Law for Government and Not Private Persons, Form #05.037
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/StatLawGovt.pdf
2. Proof of Facts: “Citizenship” means PUBLIC OFFICER of a STATE or NATION, according to the etymology of the word, SEDM
   https://sedm.org/proof-of-facts-citizenship-means-public-officer-of-a-state-or-nation-according-to-the-etymology-of-the-word/

This SCAM with the word “includes” and “including” is therefore MALICIOUSLY designed to:

1. HIDE the process of CONSENTING to taxation in the case of NATIONALS so you FALSELY believe it is mandatory as a NATIONAL.
2. Send you on a wild goose chase looking for a statute that DOESN’T exist which DOES expressly include the thing the government self-servingly wants to PRESUME it includes. That is NOT your job, but the job of the MOVING PARTY, being the government, to satisfy the burden of proof that you are “expressly included” and that they have given you the constitutionally required “reasonable notice” of WHERE you are expressly included in the statutes. If you aren’t legally educated enough to FORCE them to satisfy this burden of proof in all enforcement actions, then you DEFAULT to CONSENTING to be “included” even if the law doesn’t expressly allow it.

Thus, your own legal ignorance will be used against you to commit criminal identity theft as documented in:

Identity Theft Affidavit, Form #14.020
https://sedm.org/Forms/14-PropProtection/Identity_Theft_Affidavit-f14039.pdf

For more on this DEVIOUS form of procuring your consent through FRAUD and exploiting your legal ignorance, see:

Legal Deception, Propaganda, and Fraud, Form #05.014
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/LegalDecPropFraud.pdf

7. The CONSEQUENCES of Consent

1. Separation Between Public and Private, Form #12.025 -the result of consent to anything government officers is to:
   1.1 Convert PRIVATE property to PUBLIC property.
   1.2 Convert your civil status from PRIVATE (common law and constitutional) to PUBLIC (civil statutory).
   1.3 Convert the government from de jure to de facto (form #05.024).
   1.4 Corrupt public officials by changing their role from protectors of PRIVATE property to a profitable business whose only purpose is to make huge profits out of STEALING PRIVATE property and PRIVATE rights and denying justice itself.
2. How Scoundrels Corrupted Our Republican Form of Government (OFFSITE LINK) -accepting custody or “benefit” or use of government property is how the government acquires civil legislative jurisdiction over you. Using government property constitutes IMPLIED CONSENT to be “regulated” and “taxed”. The constitutional authority to do so derives from Article 4, Section 4. Such property INCLUDES ALL civil statutory statuses (Form #13.008) such as “citizen”, “resident”, and “person”.
3. Acquiring a Civil Status (important!) -An online version of the above. Appears in the Litigation->Civil Status (important!) menu item above.
4. Proof That There is a “Straw Man”, Form #05.042 -the STRAW MAN is a civil statutory status and government office that is PROPERTY loaned to you with legal strings attached.
5. Why Statutory Civil Law is Law for Government and Not Private Persons, Form #05.037 -civil statutory law is what the courts call the “social compact”. All “compacts” are CONTRACTS that can acquire the “force of law” ONLY by your consent, either express or implied.
6. About SSNs and TINs on Government Forms and Correspondence, Form #05.012 -The SSN/TIN:
   6.1 Is prima facie legal evidence of your consent to: receive government benefits, property, and privileges.
   6.2 Is legal evidence of a waiver of sovereignty and sovereign immunity.
   6.3 Functions as the legal equivalent of what the Federal Trade Commission calls a “franchise mark”.
   6.4 Is the means of ensuring that you never take from the government any more than you pay them, and thus remain “revenue neutral” but a slave in relation to them. It is ILLEGAL and even unconstitutional to distribute the proceeds of “taxes” to redistribute wealth by paying people more than they put in, and thus to subsidize PRIVATE activities.

8. How to AVOID producing evidence of IMPLIED Consent

1. 1040NR Attachment, Form #09.077 -attachment to a tax return that makes any kind of consent IMPOSSIBLE
2. Lawfully Avoiding Government Obligations Course, Form #12.040 -how to avoid government obligations by avoiding ACTIONS that imply consent.
3. Avoiding Traps in Government Forms Course, Form #12.023

9. How to FORCE the government in court to PROVE you consented or that it is legally IMPOSSIBLE for you to consent

1. Proof of Claim: Your Main Defense Against Government Greed and Corruption, Form #09.073 -How to FORCE the government to prove that you consented.
2. Challenge to Income Tax Enforcement Authority Within Constitutional States of the Union, Form #05.052-proof that it is legally impossible and unconstitutional to consent to become a “taxpayer” as an American National.

10. How to FLIP the relationship around to use the government’s main weapon against them and cause THEM to consent to YOU and become Your slave

1. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that you can get THE GOVERNMENT’S “invisible consent” the same way that they get yours:
   
   “The State in such cases exercises no greater right than an individual may exercise over the use of his own property when leased or loaned to others. The conditions upon which the privilege shall be enjoyed being stated or implied in the legislation authorizing its grant, no right is, of course, impaired by their enforcement. The recipient of the privilege, in effect, stipulates to comply with the conditions. It matters not how limited the privilege conferred, its acceptance implies an assent to the regulation of its use and the compensation for it.”
   [Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113 (1876) ]
   
2. Using the Laws of Property to Respond to a Federal or State Tax Collection Notice, Form #14.015– How to use the concepts in REVERSE against the government to enslave them to YOU in the context of tax collection!

11. Example 1: Traffic Stop

A franchise is legally defined as “a privilege IN THE HANDS of a subject”.

FRANCHISE. A special privilege conferred by government on individual or corporation, and which does not belong to citizens of country generally of common right. Elliott v. City of Eugene, 135 Or. 108, 294 P. 358, 360.  In England it is defined to be a royal privilege in the hands of a subject.

[Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, pp. 786-787]

SOME PROPERTY has to literally be in your hands or being use by you in connection with a specific transaction in order for you to be a “subject” under the franchise contract or quasi-contract.

“The compensation which the owners of property, not having any special rights or privileges from the government in connection with it, may demand for its use, or for their own services in union with it, forms no element of consideration in prescribing regulations for that purpose.
[. . .]
“It is only where some right or privilege [which are GOVERNMENT PROPERTY] is conferred by the government or municipality upon the owner, which he can use in connection with his property, or by means of which the use of his property is rendered more valuable to him, or he thereby enjoys an advantage over others, that the compensation to be received by him becomes a legitimate matter of regulation. Submission to the regulation of compensation in such cases is an implied condition of the grant, and the State, in exercising its power of prescribing the compensation, only determines the conditions upon which its concession shall be enjoyed. When the privilege ends, the power of regulation ceases.”
[Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113 (1876) ]

You’re not an officer 24 hours a day 7 days a week. You have to put on your “badge” or use state property in connection with the activity to be TREATED AS IF you are an officer.

When a police officer stops you, he always asks you for:

1. License
2. Registration
3. Insurance

The physical license is state property that you MUST carry “in your hands” during the transaction. You have to USE the license in connection with a SPECIFIC transaction to be a state officer. You can choose NOT to by contract. USE, not APPLICATION, is how you invoke the office and become SUBJECT to the franchise quasi-contract terms.

The license itself is predicated on the commercial use of the public roadways for hire. THAT is the “nexus” for a “public interest” and therefore a “public office”. Even if you are issued a license, but are not CONSENSUALLY engaged in the activity that is ACTUALLY LICENSED, which is the use of the public roadways for hire, then you are not engaged with what the courts call “a public interest” and are therefore private and constitutionally protected.

You can also use the public roadways for hire WITHOUT having a license, but still be liable to the quasi-contract because the ACTIVITY is what triggers jurisdiction and a public interest. So, if the officer stops you, state:

1. Do you have any evidence proving that I am using the public roadways for hire.
2. I am not invoking a privilege by using public property in connection with my private activities, which property is the license. . .OR I was never issued a license.

You are the moving party in this interaction, and you have the burden of proving that I am using public property for a commercial use, whether its the roadways for hire or the license, which is property of the state.

12. Example 2: Doctor licensing

In response to this article, some people have said about their doctor spouse:

In your hands huh? My wife has a medical license and a DEA license but never has them on her even while at work.

Your doctor wife was hired and continues to be employed ONLY on the condition that she has those licenses. Anything that is a condition of being employed or REMAINING employed is presumed to be “in the hands” of the person invoking them throughout their employment. “In your hands” of for the purposes of this discussion means “in your control” or conveying a benefit or use. A public officer, after all, is legally defined as someone IN CHARGE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PUBLIC. That property need not ALWAYS be PHYSICAL. It could be a CIVIL STATUS, such as STATUTORY “U.S. citizen”, STATUTORY “Person”, STATUTORY “taxpayer”, etc. See:

Acquiring a Civil status
https://ftsig.org/civil-political-jurisdiction/acquiring-a-civil-status/

If she terminated the license AND made her employment contract conditioned on not having such a license and terminating the license, then it would no longer be “in her hands” and her activities covered by the license would remain private.

Being a STATUTORY “employee” under 26 USC 3401(d) through a W-4 also makes your doctor wife subject to public interest and regulation. So, to be completely private, she would have to:

1. Withdraw the W-4
2. File a W-8
3. Remove the SSN from her record.
4. Make her employment agreement conditioned on not invoking the privileges of a license.
5. If in private practice, make the patient agreement into a Private Membership Association (PMA) in which protections of licensing and the the civil statutory law are waived and the common law instead are invoked.
6. Notice the state that she is private and any attempt to regulate is a taking of private property subject to the terms of the following ANTI-FRANCHISE FRANCHISE. This is usually done when the licenses are terminated:
   Injury Defense Franchise and Agreement, Form #06.027
   https://sedm.org/Forms/06-AvoidingFranch/InjuryDefenseFranchise.pdf

Remember: If you can’t, by your actions and your words, literally contract the government out of your CIVIL life (not criminal, but CIVIL), then YOU ARE A SLAVE.

What is a Slave?, SEDM
https://sedm.org/what-is-a-slave/