FAQ: Exactly what government corruption are you trying to fight by encouraging people to file as “foreign”?
QUESTION:
Exactly what government corruption are you trying to fight by encouraging people to file as “foreign”?
ANSWER:
The main source of government corruption that we are trying to fight on this website is described at the end of the list below as item 9:
1. All civil societies are based on compact or contract according to SCOTUS.
2. The reason the word “civil” is in front of the word “compact” is because THAT COMPACT is implemented with the civil statutory franchise codes.
3. You JOIN that compact or contract by consenting to call yourself a CIVIL member called a CIVIL citizen+D or resident+D. That consent manifests itself as DOMICILE or some kind of consent piled on TOP of domicile using franchises. That’s exactly what Blacks’ Dictionary and Am.Jur admitted: Franchises ADD to rights of ordinary POLITICAL citizens.
“In a legal or narrower sense, the term “franchise” is more often used to designate a right or privilege conferred by law, [1] and the view taken in a number of cases is that to be a franchise, the right possessed must be such as cannot be exercised without the express permission of the sovereign power [2] –that is, a privilege or immunity of a public nature which cannot be legally exercised without legislative grant. [3] It is a privilege conferred by government on an individual or a corporation to do that “which does not belong to the citizens [NATIONALS or “nationals of the United StatesP” who are nonresident aliens] of the country generally by common right.” [4] For example, a right to lay rail or pipes, or to string wires or poles along a public street, is not an ordinary use which everyone may make of the streets, but is a special privilege, or franchise, to be granted for the accomplishment of public objects [5] which, except for the grant, would be a trespass. [6] In this connection, the term “franchise” has sometimes been construed as meaning a grant of a right to use public property, or at least the property over which the granting authority has control. [7]”
[American Jurisprudence 2d, Franchises, §1: Definitions (1999)]
Black’s Law Dictionary REPEATS the above requirement that a franchise is a PRIVILEGE that ADDS to the powers of an ordinary POLITICAL and not CIVIL citizen* (meaning a “national of the United StatesP“) under the definition of “privilege” as follows:
Privilege. A particular benefit or advantage enjoyed by a person, company, or class beyond the common advantages of other citizens [meaning POLITICAL citizens* who are “nationals of the United StatesP” or “U.S.* nationals”]. An exceptional or extraordinary power or exemption. A peculiar right, advantage, exemption, power, franchise, or immunity held by a person or class, not generally possessed by others.
[Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 1197]
4. By consenting through either DOMICILE or an election that ADDS to domicile, you SURRENDER your PRIVATE rights in exchange for PUBLIC privileges.
5. The Constitution protects private rights. The CIVIL law protects only PUBLIC rights. That is the requirement of the PUBLIC Rights Doctrine of SCOTUS. This is also confirmed by Munn v. Illinois
When one becomes a member of society, he necessarily parts with some rights or privileges which, as an individual not affected by his relations to others, he might retain. “A body politic,” as aptly defined in the preamble of the Constitution of Massachusetts, “is a social compact by which the whole people covenants with each citizen, and each citizen with the whole people, that all shall be governed by certain laws for the common good.” This does not confer power upon the whole people to control rights which are purely and exclusively private, Thorpe v. R. & B. Railroad Co., 27 Vt. 143; but it does authorize the establishment of laws requiring each citizen to so conduct himself, and so use his own property, as not unnecessarily to injure another. This is the very essence of government, and 125*125 has found expression in the maxim sic utere tuo ut alienum non lædas. From this source come the police powers, which, as was said by Mr. Chief Justice Taney in the License Cases, 5 How. 583, “are nothing more or less than the powers of government inherent in every sovereignty, . . . that is to say, . . . the power to govern men and things.”
[Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113 (1877); SOURCE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6419197193322400931]
Although the above ruling talks about “citizen” civil status as a method of surrendering rights, that concept similarly applies to ANY civil franchise status, such as “citizen”, “resident”, “person”, “individual”, etc. All such CIVIL statuses are, after all, just a marker of SOME kind of “membership” as indicated above that causes a “tacit procuration” and surrender of PRIVATE rights in exchange for PUBLIC rights. Invoking them is an exercise of your First Amendment right to contract and associate and thereby SURRENDER PRIVATE rights in exchange for PUBLIC privileges. That subject is covered in:
Acquiring a “Civil Status”, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/civil-political-jurisdiction/acquiring-a-civil-status/
11. Compare the previous question with what the founding fathers explained the purpose of civil society is. Obviously, the current society defeats the purpose of its creation based on this quote. The status associated with “entering into society” he speaks of is that of “citizen”, and it does not accomplish what was intended obviously, at least from a civil perspective:
“It is the greatest absurdity to suppose it [would be] in the power of one, or any number of men, at the entering into society, to renounce their essential natural rights, or the means of preserving those rights; when the grand end of civil government, from the very nature of its institution, is for the support, protection, and defense of those very rights; the principal of which … are life, liberty, and property. If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake, should in terms renounce or give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right to freedom being the gift [CREATION] of God Almighty, it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily become a slave”
[Samuel Adams, The Rights of the Colonists, November 20, 1772; http://www.foundingfatherquotes.com/father/quotes/2]
6. Notice they admitted that they can’t regulate or tax or “govern” those who don’t join! That’s why the First Amendment IS the First Amendment: Because the first thing you do when forming any society is give the right to NOT consent to join. What else matters if you can’t refuse? The Godfather: An offer you can’t refuse.
7. The PURPOSE of joining is therefore to PROTECT PROPERTY, but you have to DONATE your property to the public before they can protect it. Would you hire a security guard who insisted on transferring title to all property you wanted him to protect? That is our conclusion on the FTSIG.ORG opening page.
8. Those who do NOT consent remain foreign, private, and a “non-person”.
9. Income tax are membership dues for the Private CIVIL STATUTORY Membership Association (PMA) called “the State”. As a collective it is “sovereign”, but they want you to give up all your personal sovereignty to join it. See:
Collectivism and How to Resist It Course, Form #12.024
https://sedm.org/LibertyU/Collectivism.pdf
That, in a nutshell, is the FATAL flaw of the system and why it inevitably will self-destruct: Because it is incompatible with PRIVATE property and PRIVATE rights, is based on COLLECTIVISM, and is ENGINEERED to DEFEAT the very PURPOSE of its creation, and its ONLY PURPOSE, which is the protection of PRIVATE property. The above is also EXACTLY what Meta AI agreed with also:
AI DISCOVERY: How being privileged as an alien or consenting as an American National affects your constitutional rights, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/ai-discovery-how-being-privileged-as-an-alien-or-consenting-american-national-affects-your-constitutional-rights/
10. The “U.S. person” status was created to make that process of volunteering INVISIBLE by hiding it through equivocation so that people would not be informed that they have to consent. See:
Invisible Consent, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/invisible-consent/
If you don’t understand the difference between a POLITICAL citizen* and a CIVIL/DOMICILED citizen**+D, then you will falsely believe simply being born constitutes consent to join the CIVIL compact.
All this is already on the FTSIG opening page in the conclusions, Section 13.
https://ftsig.org
If you would like more evidence that corroborates the above, see:
- U.S. Person Position, Form #05.053
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/USPersonPosition.pdf - AI DISCOVERY: How being privileged as an alien or consenting as an American National affects your constitutional rights, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/ai-discovery-how-being-privileged-as-an-alien-or-consenting-american-national-affects-your-constitutional-rights/ - Why Statutory Civil Law is Law for Government and Not Private People, Form #05.037
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/StatLawGovt.pdf - Why Domicile and Becoming a ‘Taxpayer” Require Your Consent, form #05.002
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/Domicile.pdf - How American Nationals Volunteer to Pay Income Tax, Form #08.023
https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/HowYouVolForIncomeTax.pdf - Membership in a Specific Class, Status, or Group As a Cause for Loss of Rights, SEDM
https://sedm.org/membership-in-a-specific-class-status-or-group-as-a-cause-for-loss-of-rights/