Proofs
Proof of legal principles.
PROOF: Ambiguous tax statutes are to be construed against the government
The U.S. Supreme Court has long held that ambiguities in tax statutes are to be construed in favor of the…
PROOF: “IncludIBLE” or “includABLE”?
The main word used for equivocation about whether an earning is statutory “income” is the word “includible” v. “includable”. Here…
PROOF: You’re Not the “Employee” mentioned in 26 U.S.C. 3401(c)
FALSE STATEMENT: We as a company have to to do “wage” withholding and reporting on you because we are an…
PROOF: Capital v. Income
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Distinguishing Between Capital and Income What it the difference between capital and income, and what is…
PROOF: Exemptions v. Exclusions
SOURCE: Excluded Earnings and People, Form #14.019, Section 4; https://sedm.org/Forms/14-PropProtection/ExcludedEarningsAndPeople.pdf It is CRUCIAL to understand the distinction between being CONSTITUTIONALLY…
PROOF: “INTERNAL” within “IRS” name means inside the government and “taxpayers” work for the Treasury
For an example of how to implement the above in responding to a tax collection notice, see: Using the Laws…
PROOF: The Creator is the Owner
EDITORIAL: Throughout IRS publications, they frequently use the phrase “created or organized” as a way to describe things they have…
PROOF: Government Style Manual “state”
The U.S. Government Style Manual, 2016 Edition, on p. 32 says the following: So a LOWER CASE “state” refers to…
PROOF: Doubts about legislative construction must be resolved in favor of the Taxpayer
“The language of section 61(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, set forth above, might at first glance appear…
PROOF: Itemized list of “benefits” available to “U.S. citizens”
Below is a comprehensive list of benefits available to those who claim CIVIL/DOMICILED C**D status. Thus, a “U.S. person” election…