Corruption

Government corruption and how to defend against it.

Copilot: Mapping of Political Questions Doctrine to FTSIG Symbology and Terminology

By ftsig-admin / April 8, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Mapping of Political Questions Doctrine to FTSIG Symbology and Terminology

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions deals with how courts collapse CIVIL and POLITICAL categories into one in order to unlawfully enlarge their jurisdiction and authority and destroy the separation of powers as documented in: Government Conspiracy to Destroy the Separation of Powers, Form #05.023https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/SeparationOfPowers.pdf Montesquieu was the man who engineered the now famous three branch…

PROOF OF FACTS: Why CIVIL statutory “citizen” of the United States in 26 U.S.C. 1.1-1(a) and (b) is voluntary

By ftsig-admin / April 3, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Why CIVIL statutory “citizen” of the United States in 26 U.S.C. 1.1-1(a) and (b) is voluntary

INTRODUCTION: This series of facts prove that the “citizen” who is “of the United StatesF” in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (b) is voluntary for American nationals described in the Fourteenth Amendment. Once you get the terminology down as we have, the problem becomes much clearer. This is why they had to create the NRA and…

Copilot: Standing to Prosecute Involuntary Domestic Status Classification

By ftsig-admin / April 3, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Standing to Prosecute Involuntary Domestic Status Classification

INTRODUCTION: Statutory “withholding agents” and “employers” are what is called “ministerial officers”. There are strict limits on what they are permitted to do by law. This series of questions describes how to challenge compelled domestic status capacity elections by ministerial officers in the context of withholding, reporting, and the processing of tax returns. Further information…

Why Artificial Intelligence is of ZERO value in telling the truth about CORRUPT judicial doctrine

By ftsig-admin / March 29, 2026 / Comments Off on Why Artificial Intelligence is of ZERO value in telling the truth about CORRUPT judicial doctrine

INTRODUCTION: Microsoft Copilot, Chatgpt 5.4, 3/29/26 The Bill of Rights IS the national common law: “It would be a very curious and unsatisfactory result, if, in construing a provision of constitutional law, always understood to have been adopted for protection and security to the rights of the individual as against the government, and which has…

HOW TO: Distinguishing “Facts” from “Legal Conclusions”

By ftsig-admin / February 21, 2026 / Comments Off on HOW TO: Distinguishing “Facts” from “Legal Conclusions”

INTRODUCTION: In the following article, we establish that your selection of form and the elections you make on the form are “legal conclusions” and not facts: Process to “Invisibly” join the Matrix: Electing a CIVIL STATUTORY STATUS, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/process-to-invisibly-join-the-matrix-electing-a-civil-statutory-status/ This series of questions explores this subject at great depth to: QUESTION 1: Describe all the attributes…

PROOF OF FACTS: Courts admit they don’t give a damn about protecting your private rights or property, which is the ONLY purpose of establishing government to begin with

By ftsig-admin / February 17, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Courts admit they don’t give a damn about protecting your private rights or property, which is the ONLY purpose of establishing government to begin with

INTRODUCTION: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these [PRIVATE] rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the…

PROOF OF FACTS: Involuntary civil statutory obligations are a product of Judicial Corruption of Republican Principles

By ftsig-admin / February 6, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Involuntary civil statutory obligations are a product of Judicial Corruption of Republican Principles

INTRODUCTION: And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them.[Eph. 5:11, Bible, NKJV] If there ever was a detailed description of “The Matrix” in the movie “The Matrix” from a philosophical, political, legal, and a constitutional basis, THIS IS IT. THIS is The Matrix we all live within usually unknowingly. Welcome to…

PROOF OF FACTS: Income taxation of “nationals of the United States” within the exclusive jurisdiction of a constitutional state is NOT a “sovereign power”

By ftsig-admin / January 11, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Income taxation of “nationals of the United States” within the exclusive jurisdiction of a constitutional state is NOT a “sovereign power”

INTRODUCTION: Microsoft Copilot. This interchange establishes that: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: Is income taxation within the exclusive jurisdiction of a constitutional state among ONLY “nationals of the Untied States” under 26 U.S.C. 873 standing on land protected by the constitution a “sovereign power”? Note that I’m not talking about aliens abroad or…

Copilot: Origin of domicile and authority of courts to use it

By ftsig-admin / December 18, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: Origin of domicile and authority of courts to use it

INTRODUCTION: This interchange proves that domicile is a SCAM of monumental proportions. We don’t think there’s anything wrong with national political membership/citizenship per se. But the national government uses a subclass of said citizens coupled with United StatesGOV (which is really just a label/signal for civil & criminal federal preemption) instead of United StatesP to…

Copilot: When did the word “private” transition from absolute ownership under the common law to usufructary ownership under civil statutes?

By ftsig-admin / December 3, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: When did the word “private” transition from absolute ownership under the common law to usufructary ownership under civil statutes?

INTRODUCTION: More information on this subject at: QUESTION 1: When did the term “private” transition from being defined as absolute ownership under common law principles to shared ownership through the personPUB usufruct under the civil statutory law? ANSWER 1: Great clarification — you’re asking specifically about the juridical shift in the meaning of “private”: from…