Proofs
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: 1. Judges are not legislators. That’s reserved to the Legislative branch. 2. The most fundamental part of legislating is defining terms. 3. Thus judges can neither define or limit the definition of terms, either found in legislation or in the English dictionary. 4. To refuse to invoke or recognize (censor)…
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Introduction Conclusions INTRODUCTION This article provides evidence proving that the the government actually says the average PRIVATE American national is NOT legally allowed to volunteer. 1. Private property is NOT within the legislative jurisdiction of Congress Only within the criminal or common law and the sovereign mode of civil statutes may government…
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: According to 1 USC 204 legislative notes, title 26 has never been enacted into positive law. Thus: 1. It is prima facie evidence of law. 2. Prima facie means PRESUMED. 3. Presumptions that impair private rightsPRI and private propertyPRI violation constitutional due process. 4. Thus, the only thing it can…
INTRODUCTION: This article PROVES: LIARS! Money grubbers! If you’re an alien physically residing within the exclusive jurisdiction of a constitutional state, we have a new acronym for you: IRS:I = I’mR = ReallyS = Stupid The following articles ALSO prove that this same alien earns NO income under 26 U.S.C. 871(a)! More at: DEFINITIONS: Tax…
INTRODUCTION: The only express liability found in I.R.C. Subtitle A is withholding agents on nonresident aliens who are aliens in 26 U.S.C. 1461. Everyone else is a volunteer. This leads to the question of how they can owe tax on Fixed, Determinable, Annual, and Periodical (FDAP) earnings under 26 U.S.C. 871(a). This series of questions…
INTRODUCTION: This series of Copilot questions proves with law and evidence that: More at: QUESTION 1: Because Proprietary Mode taxation exclusively under the Sixteenth Amendment depends on a personPUB to attach private propertyPRI to so it can be taxed, then: 1. Doesn’t the I.R.C. Subtitles A and C income tax function essentially as a “rent…
INTRODUCTION: I. Overview and Central Thesis The article presents a comprehensive argument within the FTSIG ontology that civil statutory privileges—benefits, elections, and statuses created by federal civil statutes—operate under two fundamentally different jurisdictional regimes: The article asserts that these distinctions are absolute, universal, and independent of geography. Whether a person stands in Texas or Tokyo,…
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Introduction Executive Summary: Subtitle A does not tax private persons or private earnings; it taxes the emoluments of a federal public office defined in § 7701(a)(26) as “the performance of the functions of a public office.” In every context involving “citizen,” “income,” residency, source rules, or “trade or business,” the term “United…
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: 1. Does the unconstitutional conditions doctrine apply to areas subject to the fundamental rights doctrine? 2. List all the authorities that validate your answer. ANSWER 1: Yes. The Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine does apply in areas governed by the Fundamental Rights Doctrine. The reason is straightforward: wherever fundamental rights remain operative,…
INTRODUCTION: Microsoft Copilot. This article establishes that: The purpose of this article is NOT to provide remedy for identity theft, but merely to document it. More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: Can you prove that every civil statutory status or tax status created by congress is a public capacity? ANSWER 1: The short answer:…